![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1547741 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201805 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | 1F7.Airport |
| State Reference | TX |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb Takeoff |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 55 Flight Crew Total 3045 Flight Crew Type 170 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Object |
| Miss Distance | Horizontal 100 Vertical 0 |
Narrative:
Prior to a local flight at 1f7 to practice touch and goes; no notams about antennas or obstructions were noted when I checked during preflight. While in flight and on go-around on runway 13; I saw an antenna whiz by that has been mounted on to what appears to be the maintenance hangar; with no NOTAM added for the hazardous obstruction. Fortunately I am familiar with this airport and was on centerline for the go-around; but less familiar pilots with any left-drift on runway 13 or right drift on runway 31 will have a considerably reduced margin of safety for obstruction avoidance. I'm not sure why the new tower isn't notamed; it certainly seems hazardous enough to warrant consideration for the flying public.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GA pilot reported an obstruction on top of a hangar that is neither documented nor published in the NOTAMs.
Narrative: Prior to a local flight at 1F7 to practice touch and goes; no NOTAMs about antennas or obstructions were noted when I checked during preflight. While in flight and on go-around on runway 13; I saw an antenna whiz by that has been mounted on to what appears to be the maintenance hangar; with no NOTAM added for the hazardous obstruction. Fortunately I am familiar with this airport and was on centerline for the go-around; but less familiar pilots with any left-drift on runway 13 or right drift on runway 31 will have a considerably reduced margin of safety for obstruction avoidance. I'm not sure why the new tower isn't NOTAMed; it certainly seems hazardous enough to warrant consideration for the flying public.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.