![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1532055 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201804 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | CWF.Airport |
| State Reference | LA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Transport Low Wing 2 Turboprop Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Taxi |
| Route In Use | Direct |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Flight Phase | Landing Final Approach |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 25 Flight Crew Total 11025 Flight Crew Type 250 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 27 Flight Crew Total 2340 Flight Crew Type 1277 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Ground Incursion Runway |
| Miss Distance | Horizontal 2000 Vertical 500 |
Narrative:
Primary runway at cwf closed; taxiway a now used as runway 16/34. Our aircraft was cleared to taxi and hold short of runway 16. Our aircraft taxied past the non-movement boundary markings off the ramp to a safe distance from another set of markings and lights lining the temporary runway. Our aircraft was instructed to return to the opposite side of the non-movement area boundary markings as an aircraft landing on 16 on half mile final was told to go around.I believe this issue stems from the use of non-standard hold short markings with no prior warning from either ATC or NOTAM. Notams at the time of arrival indicate no alternate runway markings were being used. If a non-movement area boundary marking is to be used as a runway hold short marking; it should be noted as such.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Small Transport flight crew reported being unable to distinguish the hold short lines from non-movement area boundary marking for a temporary runway at CWF.
Narrative: Primary runway at CWF closed; taxiway A now used as runway 16/34. Our aircraft was cleared to taxi and hold short of runway 16. Our aircraft taxied past the non-movement boundary markings off the ramp to a safe distance from another set of markings and lights lining the temporary runway. Our aircraft was instructed to return to the opposite side of the non-movement area boundary markings as an aircraft landing on 16 on half mile final was told to go around.I believe this issue stems from the use of non-standard hold short markings with no prior warning from either ATC or NOTAM. NOTAMs at the time of arrival indicate no alternate runway markings were being used. If a non-movement area boundary marking is to be used as a runway hold short marking; it should be noted as such.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.