![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1520795 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201802 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | IAH.Airport |
| State Reference | TX |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Mixed |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | A320 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Type 2035 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
On departure ran into numerous areas of adverse weather; categorized as moderate to heavy and some extreme precipitation areas by ATC. The weather radar does a good job providing guidance for avoidance out to about 80 nm. Beyond that distance; the effectiveness is greatly reduced (in my opinion). We were able to utilize wsi (weather services international) and its radar/satellite data to give us a longer range view and provide exceptional guidance; especially when compared to our onboard weather radar. As a result we were able to avoid problem areas providing our passengers and crew the safest possible course/route of flight. A limitation is the weak wi-fi signal on our aircraft. Improving the wi-fi signal [and] providing wsi data to every flight must be a priority as this is an invaluable asset!an example; [on] our return flight; wifi [was] intermittent to inop and numerous thunderstorms during [the] final hour required [constant] ACARS messaging between our flight and our dispatcher. Extremely distracting.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A320 Captain reported a weak Wi-Fi signal hindered the effectiveness of the WSI (Weather Services International) program.
Narrative: On departure ran into numerous areas of adverse weather; categorized as moderate to heavy and some extreme precipitation areas by ATC. The weather radar does a good job providing guidance for avoidance out to about 80 nm. Beyond that distance; the effectiveness is greatly reduced (in my opinion). We were able to utilize WSI (Weather Services International) and its radar/satellite data to give us a longer range view and provide exceptional guidance; especially when compared to our onboard weather radar. As a result we were able to avoid problem areas providing our passengers and crew the safest possible course/route of flight. A limitation is the weak Wi-Fi signal on our aircraft. Improving the Wi-Fi signal [and] providing WSI data to EVERY flight must be a priority as this is an invaluable asset!An example; [on] our return flight; WiFi [was] intermittent to inop and numerous thunderstorms during [the] final hour required [constant] ACARS messaging between our flight and our Dispatcher. Extremely distracting.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.