Narrative:

On takeoff prior to V1, 'egt' warn light illuminated. I requested the second officer to keep engine temperature below 960 degrees. After takeoff, temperatures stabilized and flight was continued west/O any further incident. I noticed that at cruise #2 engine egt was indicating 40 degree higher than the #1. Approximately 1 hour after takeoff, both pressure regulator fault lights illuminated. Complied with procedure and system was isolated. Not being able to determine the problem I requested the maintenance supervisor, to meet the flight. Upon arrival in sea, maintenance supervisor, technicians and outbnd captain met the aircraft and we personally briefed them and pointed out all indications. We had no knowledge that bleed duct clamp did in fact fail. In not knowing exactly the nature of the problem we felt it would be best to explain the problem to maintenance technicians, and leave them with the decision to take care of the problem. The bleed pressure regulator indication was intermittent and previously written up as such. I strongly recommend that an oral brief should be considered as important as a written discrepancy and therefore treated as a reason to investigate the source of the symptoms.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: WDB ACR HAS BLEED DUCT CLAMP FAIL ON #2 ENGINE.

Narrative: ON TKOF PRIOR TO V1, 'EGT' WARN LIGHT ILLUMINATED. I REQUESTED THE S/O TO KEEP ENG TEMP BELOW 960 DEGS. AFTER TKOF, TEMPS STABILIZED AND FLT WAS CONTINUED W/O ANY FURTHER INCIDENT. I NOTICED THAT AT CRUISE #2 ENG EGT WAS INDICATING 40 DEG HIGHER THAN THE #1. APPROX 1 HR AFTER TKOF, BOTH PRESSURE REGULATOR FAULT LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. COMPLIED WITH PROC AND SYSTEM WAS ISOLATED. NOT BEING ABLE TO DETERMINE THE PROB I REQUESTED THE MAINT SUPVR, TO MEET THE FLT. UPON ARR IN SEA, MAINT SUPVR, TECHNICIANS AND OUTBND CAPT MET THE ACFT AND WE PERSONALLY BRIEFED THEM AND POINTED OUT ALL INDICATIONS. WE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE THAT BLEED DUCT CLAMP DID IN FACT FAIL. IN NOT KNOWING EXACTLY THE NATURE OF THE PROB WE FELT IT WOULD BE BEST TO EXPLAIN THE PROB TO MAINT TECHNICIANS, AND LEAVE THEM WITH THE DECISION TO TAKE CARE OF THE PROB. THE BLEED PRESSURE REGULATOR INDICATION WAS INTERMITTENT AND PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN UP AS SUCH. I STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT AN ORAL BRIEF SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IMPORTANT AS A WRITTEN DISCREPANCY AND THEREFORE TREATED AS A REASON TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THE SYMPTOMS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.