Narrative:

While preoccupied with other cockpit duties, we had a heading EFIS comp warning (this is common in flight and is generally momentary). I cancelled warning and went back to watching for traffic. Assigned heading was 340, I noticed we were on a 010 degree heading visually, so I disconnected autoplt and returned to the proper heading by visibility reference. This particular warning lasted about 7 mins before correcting itself. Maybe strong electromagnetic interference north of O'hare. By habit I cancelled what is normally a momentary warning, instead of immediately identifying and correcting the problem. The warning system cries wolf so many times that when a warning that actually needed attention occurred I ignored it. Automation strikes again.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: HEADING DEVIATION WHEN A COMPASS WARNKNG WAS IGNORED.

Narrative: WHILE PREOCCUPIED WITH OTHER COCKPIT DUTIES, WE HAD A HDG EFIS COMP WARNING (THIS IS COMMON IN FLT AND IS GENERALLY MOMENTARY). I CANCELLED WARNING AND WENT BACK TO WATCHING FOR TFC. ASSIGNED HDG WAS 340, I NOTICED WE WERE ON A 010 DEG HDG VISUALLY, SO I DISCONNECTED AUTOPLT AND RETURNED TO THE PROPER HDG BY VIS REFERENCE. THIS PARTICULAR WARNING LASTED ABOUT 7 MINS BEFORE CORRECTING ITSELF. MAYBE STRONG ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE N OF O'HARE. BY HABIT I CANCELLED WHAT IS NORMALLY A MOMENTARY WARNING, INSTEAD OF IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING THE PROB. THE WARNING SYS CRIES WOLF SO MANY TIMES THAT WHEN A WARNING THAT ACTUALLY NEEDED ATTN OCCURRED I IGNORED IT. AUTOMATION STRIKES AGAIN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.