Narrative:

My approach to runway 25 procedure was interrupted by control tower indicating transitioning traffic in the final approach area. Made a gear up landing classified as an incident per FAA. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: traffic advisories for 2 aircraft in the approach area both interrupted reporter's checklist use and gave him out of cockpit concern to sight the traffic. Aircraft damaged sufficiently to be expensive to repair, but still counted as an incident by FAA/NTSB. FAA had reporter take 5 hours dual re-training and took no other action.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA MAKES GEAR UP LNDG.

Narrative: MY APCH TO RWY 25 PROC WAS INTERRUPTED BY CTL TWR INDICATING TRANSITIONING TFC IN THE FINAL APCH AREA. MADE A GEAR UP LNDG CLASSIFIED AS AN INCIDENT PER FAA. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: TFC ADVISORIES FOR 2 ACFT IN THE APCH AREA BOTH INTERRUPTED RPTR'S CHKLIST USE AND GAVE HIM OUT OF COCKPIT CONCERN TO SIGHT THE TFC. ACFT DAMAGED SUFFICIENTLY TO BE EXPENSIVE TO REPAIR, BUT STILL COUNTED AS AN INCIDENT BY FAA/NTSB. FAA HAD RPTR TAKE 5 HRS DUAL RE-TRNING AND TOOK NO OTHER ACTION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.