Air carrier medium large transport tower commanded go around not coordination with bay TRACON.

Attributes
ACN	141122
Time
Date	199003
Day	Thu
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : oak
State Reference	CA
Altitude	agl bound lower : 600 agl bound upper : 600
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : oak tower : oak
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing : go around
Flight Plan	IFR
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Flight Phase	ground : holding ground other : taxi other
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : atp pilot : instrument
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 170 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 2000
ASRS Report	141122
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Events
Anomaly	conflict : airborne less severe
Independent Detector	other controllera other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact other
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	ATC Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Inter Facility Coordination Failure Operational Error

Narrative:

Established on the ILS approach runway 29 at oak, flaps 40 degree. At 600' AGL the tower directed us (medium large transport X) to go missed approach. The captain acknowledged and said we were going missed approach and asked why. The controller stated that there was back taxi and in position traffic. The tower then tried to raise aircraft Y traffic. As we executed the go around we received no further instructions. We executed the published missed approach instructions for the ILS runway 29. As we completed the turn out from oak the captain requested an approach frequency. Tower gave us the frequency with no other instructions. Sfo departure handled us and set us up for the second approach. They had not been informed of our missed approach and it might have caused a traffic conflict for them. I think that this might have happened due to oak tower being concerned about the problems on runway 29 and not giving us instructions that sfo departure was expecting.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR MLG TWR COMMANDED GO AROUND NOT COORD WITH BAY TRACON.

Narrative: ESTABLISHED ON THE ILS APCH RWY 29 AT OAK, FLAPS 40 DEG. AT 600' AGL THE TWR DIRECTED US (MLG X) TO GO MISSED APCH. THE CAPT ACKNOWLEDGED AND SAID WE WERE GOING MISSED APCH AND ASKED WHY. THE CTLR STATED THAT THERE WAS BACK TAXI AND IN POS TFC. THE TWR THEN TRIED TO RAISE ACFT Y TFC. AS WE EXECUTED THE GO AROUND WE RECEIVED NO FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS. WE EXECUTED THE PUBLISHED MISSED APCH INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ILS RWY 29. AS WE COMPLETED THE TURN OUT FROM OAK THE CAPT REQUESTED AN APCH FREQ. TWR GAVE US THE FREQ WITH NO OTHER INSTRUCTIONS. SFO DEP HANDLED US AND SET US UP FOR THE SECOND APCH. THEY HAD NOT BEEN INFORMED OF OUR MISSED APCH AND IT MIGHT HAVE CAUSED A TFC CONFLICT FOR THEM. I THINK THAT THIS MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED DUE TO OAK TWR BEING CONCERNED ABOUT THE PROBS ON RWY 29 AND NOT GIVING US INSTRUCTIONS THAT SFO DEP WAS EXPECTING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.