Narrative:

While descending into msp; we were given vectors for the ILS Z 30R. We were told to intercept the localizer and track it inbound. Once we were on the localizer we were given a descent. During the descent we were cleared for the ILS Z 30R. We were also told to slow and maintain 180 kts until the marker. For us to slow down in a timely manner; the PF used the flight spoilers. We intercepted the glide slope and descended on the approach. The clouds were (if I remember right) about 2300 broken. While we descended through this layer we picked up moderate rime ice. Upon coming out of the clouds; my captain stated that the plane has a really high pitch attitude. I agreed with his statement. He stated the same observation again and I started to look for causes. It was fairly dark in the cockpit; so I was reading through the messages on the EICAS. That is when I noticed that the flight spoilers were still deployed. I immediately told the PF that his spoilers were deployed and he stowed them. I believe this was remedied around 800 ft AGL.I would add flight spoilers to the landing checklist. This would ensure that flight spoilers are stowed before the 1000 ft stable approach requirement.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CRJ-900 First Officer reported the flight spoilers were mistakenly left deployed while on final approach. They were noticed and stowed at 800 ft AGL.

Narrative: While descending into MSP; we were given vectors for the ILS Z 30R. We were told to intercept the localizer and track it inbound. Once we were on the localizer we were given a descent. During the descent we were cleared for the ILS Z 30R. We were also told to slow and maintain 180 kts until the marker. For us to slow down in a timely manner; the PF used the flight spoilers. We intercepted the glide slope and descended on the approach. The clouds were (if I remember right) about 2300 broken. While we descended through this layer we picked up moderate rime ice. Upon coming out of the clouds; my captain stated that the plane has a really high pitch attitude. I agreed with his statement. He stated the same observation again and I started to look for causes. It was fairly dark in the cockpit; so I was reading through the messages on the EICAS. That is when I noticed that the flight spoilers were still deployed. I immediately told the PF that his spoilers were deployed and he stowed them. I believe this was remedied around 800 ft AGL.I would add flight spoilers to the landing checklist. This would ensure that flight spoilers are stowed before the 1000 ft stable approach requirement.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.