![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1403468 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201611 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ELP.TRACON | 
| State Reference | TX | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Medium Transport | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Cruise | 
| Route In Use | Vectors | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Retractable Gear  | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | Cruise | 
| Flight Plan | VFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach | 
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Developmental | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types  | 
Narrative:
Working the radar east position; [I] told aircraft X to turn right to a 140 heading to avoid traffic and descend to nine thousand. I was having issues with another aircraft and my attention was on that situation. Aircraft Y was 10 miles west of elp and his altitude had been changing between 8;500 and 9;000. When I realized that aircraft X and aircraft Y had only 300 feet apart vertically and their lateral separation was diminishing I turned aircraft X to a 070 heading to avoid aircraft Y. Aircraft X said he was responding to an RA and climbed to 9;300.I think a better scan would have helped me realize the situation sooner. Also; assigning a higher altitude would have given me more control over the situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ELP TRACON Controller reported a NMAC between a VFR and an IFR aircraft. Controller lost situational awareness while being distracted with a third aircraft.
Narrative: Working the Radar East position; [I] told Aircraft X to turn right to a 140 heading to avoid traffic and descend to nine thousand. I was having issues with another aircraft and my attention was on that situation. Aircraft Y was 10 miles west of ELP and his altitude had been changing between 8;500 and 9;000. When I realized that Aircraft X and Aircraft Y had only 300 feet apart vertically and their lateral separation was diminishing I turned Aircraft X to a 070 heading to avoid Aircraft Y. Aircraft X said he was responding to an RA and climbed to 9;300.I think a better scan would have helped me realize the situation sooner. Also; assigning a higher altitude would have given me more control over the situation.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.