Narrative:

We were departing avq; an uncontrolled airport. The copilot received the clearance. 'Tus as filed maintain 7000'. We decided to do the obstacle departure; as we thought that was what ATC expected. We departed runway 30; on climb out prior to contacting departure; we flew through a large group of parachutists at about 6500 feet. After contacting departure they gave us an immediate turn. Departure asked if we saw the parachutists; and we replied that we did. Departure asked us why we didn't go directly to tus; and we replied that we were on the obstacle departure. Better communications between ATC and the pilots. ATC knew of parachute activity in the area. The pilots knew we were planning the obstacle departure; but that was not communicated to ATC.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Fractional jet flight crew reported departing AVQ on an IFR flight plan using the obstacle departure procedure. ATC had expected the flight to fly direct to TUS and the departure took the flight through a group of skydivers.

Narrative: We were departing AVQ; an uncontrolled airport. The copilot received the clearance. 'TUS as filed maintain 7000'. We decided to do the obstacle departure; as we thought that was what ATC expected. We departed runway 30; on climb out prior to contacting departure; we flew through a large group of parachutists at about 6500 feet. After contacting departure they gave us an immediate turn. Departure asked if we saw the parachutists; and we replied that we did. Departure asked us why we didn't go directly to TUS; and we replied that we were on the obstacle departure. Better communications between ATC and the pilots. ATC knew of parachute activity in the area. The pilots knew we were planning the obstacle departure; but that was not communicated to ATC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.