Narrative:

En route to den, while descending between FL324 and FL322 to FL310, center gave us another altitude. I thought it might have been FL230, which is a totally unusual altitude, but my first officer, when I asked him, responded FL290. So, I said, 'was it FL290 or FL320?' he said, 'FL290,' and responded to ATC den, 'air carrier X cleared 290.' ATC responded. At FL304 ATC responded, 'we show you at FL302. You were supposed to be at FL320.' we responded that we would return to FL320, but we were cleared to FL290. I called ATC den. They said that after review of tapes the alert had gone off, but it was due to controller giving company aircraft at FL310 descent to FL290 ahead of us, and then giving us FL310, which is why he tried to stop us at FL320.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR DESCENDED TO AN OCCUPIED ALT RESULTING IN LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.

Narrative: ENRTE TO DEN, WHILE DSNDING BTWN FL324 AND FL322 TO FL310, CENTER GAVE US ANOTHER ALT. I THOUGHT IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN FL230, WHICH IS A TOTALLY UNUSUAL ALT, BUT MY F/O, WHEN I ASKED HIM, RESPONDED FL290. SO, I SAID, 'WAS IT FL290 OR FL320?' HE SAID, 'FL290,' AND RESPONDED TO ATC DEN, 'ACR X CLRED 290.' ATC RESPONDED. AT FL304 ATC RESPONDED, 'WE SHOW YOU AT FL302. YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BE AT FL320.' WE RESPONDED THAT WE WOULD RETURN TO FL320, BUT WE WERE CLRED TO FL290. I CALLED ATC DEN. THEY SAID THAT AFTER REVIEW OF TAPES THE ALERT HAD GONE OFF, BUT IT WAS DUE TO CTLR GIVING COMPANY ACFT AT FL310 DSCNT TO FL290 AHEAD OF US, AND THEN GIVING US FL310, WHICH IS WHY HE TRIED TO STOP US AT FL320.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.