Narrative:

Taxiing from south ramp to 35L told to hold short of 26L. This was our second attempt at departure we had multiple mechanic problems with our first aircraft - an light transport. This was a new copilot and his first trip. We were now being redispatched in an light transport as a backup airplane. The copilot was totally unfamiliar with the layout of the plane. We now were distraction by electrical problems. He was working the radios and I was trying to troubleshoot. We were cleared (he said) across 26L and cross 26R follow a widebody transport and taxi to 35L. I had not heard this call. Looking I saw an aircraft out on final and no one on the runway. We crossed I heard ATC say something about 'acknowledge' and we called ground on the other side of 26R and were told to go back to tower. They told us that we were to have held short of the right also and that that was acknowledged. The copilot did not acknowledge that call but thought that someone else on the frequency, due to confusion had. The basic problem was my priority of the problems I was dealing with. I had a copilot was very unsure of himself on the radios. An airplane that was having electrical problems plus a copilot who was also new to jets, high density operations and unschooled in the specific airplane we were in. My mistake was trying to handle all of those things simultaneously. In retrospect, instead of relying on him I should have handled all radio calls and just taxied the aircraft to an area where I could work out the mechanicals and checklists. I had personally trained this man on ground school subjects and knew his system knowledge to be adequate (in the classroom). Another airman had given him a flight check and said he was satisfactory, but when it was all put together 'under fire' he was not adequate. I misjudged by assigning priorities the way I would with a 'usual' copilot and not the way I should have.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLT CREW OF ATX-LTT TAXIES ACROSS RWY THEY WERE TOLD TO HOLD SHORT OF DUE TO HIGH COCKPIT WORKLOAD. SCHEDULE PRESSURE, AND CONFUSION ON THE FREQ THAT CAUSED ANOTHER ACFT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE HOLD SHORT CLRNC.

Narrative: TAXIING FROM S RAMP TO 35L TOLD TO HOLD SHORT OF 26L. THIS WAS OUR SECOND ATTEMPT AT DEP WE HAD MULTIPLE MECH PROBS WITH OUR FIRST ACFT - AN LTT. THIS WAS A NEW COPLT AND HIS FIRST TRIP. WE WERE NOW BEING REDISPATCHED IN AN LTT AS A BACKUP AIRPLANE. THE COPLT WAS TOTALLY UNFAMILIAR WITH THE LAYOUT OF THE PLANE. WE NOW WERE DISTR BY ELECTRICAL PROBS. HE WAS WORKING THE RADIOS AND I WAS TRYING TO TROUBLESHOOT. WE WERE CLRED (HE SAID) ACROSS 26L AND CROSS 26R FOLLOW A WDB AND TAXI TO 35L. I HAD NOT HEARD THIS CALL. LOOKING I SAW AN ACFT OUT ON FINAL AND NO ONE ON THE RWY. WE CROSSED I HEARD ATC SAY SOMETHING ABOUT 'ACKNOWLEDGE' AND WE CALLED GND ON THE OTHER SIDE OF 26R AND WERE TOLD TO GO BACK TO TWR. THEY TOLD US THAT WE WERE TO HAVE HELD SHORT OF THE R ALSO AND THAT THAT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED. THE COPLT DID NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT CALL BUT THOUGHT THAT SOMEONE ELSE ON THE FREQ, DUE TO CONFUSION HAD. THE BASIC PROB WAS MY PRIORITY OF THE PROBS I WAS DEALING WITH. I HAD A COPLT WAS VERY UNSURE OF HIMSELF ON THE RADIOS. AN AIRPLANE THAT WAS HAVING ELECTRICAL PROBS PLUS A COPLT WHO WAS ALSO NEW TO JETS, HIGH DENSITY OPERATIONS AND UNSCHOOLED IN THE SPECIFIC AIRPLANE WE WERE IN. MY MISTAKE WAS TRYING TO HANDLE ALL OF THOSE THINGS SIMULTANEOUSLY. IN RETROSPECT, INSTEAD OF RELYING ON HIM I SHOULD HAVE HANDLED ALL RADIO CALLS AND JUST TAXIED THE ACFT TO AN AREA WHERE I COULD WORK OUT THE MECHANICALS AND CHKLISTS. I HAD PERSONALLY TRAINED THIS MAN ON GND SCHOOL SUBJECTS AND KNEW HIS SYS KNOWLEDGE TO BE ADEQUATE (IN THE CLASSROOM). ANOTHER AIRMAN HAD GIVEN HIM A FLT CHK AND SAID HE WAS SATISFACTORY, BUT WHEN IT WAS ALL PUT TOGETHER 'UNDER FIRE' HE WAS NOT ADEQUATE. I MISJUDGED BY ASSIGNING PRIORITIES THE WAY I WOULD WITH A 'USUAL' COPLT AND NOT THE WAY I SHOULD HAVE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.