MTR X failed to comply with ATC clearance. Pilot deviation.

Attributes
ACN	136712
Time
Date	199002
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	atc facility : bad
State Reference	LA
Altitude	msl bound lower : 0 msl bound upper : 9500
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : shv
Operator	other
Make Model Name	Military Trainer
Flight Phase	climbout : initial climbout : intermediate altitude
Route In Use	enroute : on vectors
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	government : faa
Function	controller : departure
Qualification	controller : radar
Experience	controller military : 3 controller radar : 1
ASRS Report	136712
Person 2
Affiliation	government : military
Function	instruction : instructor oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : military
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	other
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation Intra Facility Coordination Failure

Narrative:

MTR X departed bad on an IFR flight plan to end. Bad tower issued departure instruction to MTR X 'to fly runway on departure' as part of his IFR clearance. Aircraft departed bad runway 15. MTR X never called departure, at about 2 mi off the departure runway the aircraft started a right turn. I, the departure controller, attempted to contact the aircraft on 243.0 and issued heading 150 and to contact departure on 350.2. No reply was received, and no call to departure was made. Another call was made on 243.0 for MTR X to maintain 12000 and to call departure. MTR X finally contacted departure control 8 mi south of bad, heading west, out of 9500. Adjacent radar sector line runs parallel to extended centerline of runway 15/33. Aircraft was 4 mi inside of next controller's airspace, climbing. As I have reported before, it is obvious the instructor pilot (ip) is not maintaining control of his trainee/aircraft. In a high performance military jet, this is totally unacceptable and very dangerous.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MTR X FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ATC CLRNC. PLT DEVIATION.

Narrative: MTR X DEPARTED BAD ON AN IFR FLT PLAN TO END. BAD TWR ISSUED DEP INSTRUCTION TO MTR X 'TO FLY RWY ON DEP' AS PART OF HIS IFR CLRNC. ACFT DEPARTED BAD RWY 15. MTR X NEVER CALLED DEP, AT ABOUT 2 MI OFF THE DEP RWY THE ACFT STARTED A RIGHT TURN. I, THE DEP CTLR, ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT THE ACFT ON 243.0 AND ISSUED HDG 150 AND TO CONTACT DEP ON 350.2. NO REPLY WAS RECEIVED, AND NO CALL TO DEP WAS MADE. ANOTHER CALL WAS MADE ON 243.0 FOR MTR X TO MAINTAIN 12000 AND TO CALL DEP. MTR X FINALLY CONTACTED DEP CTL 8 MI S OF BAD, HDG W, OUT OF 9500. ADJACENT RADAR SECTOR LINE RUNS PARALLEL TO EXTENDED CENTERLINE OF RWY 15/33. ACFT WAS 4 MI INSIDE OF NEXT CTLR'S AIRSPACE, CLIMBING. AS I HAVE REPORTED BEFORE, IT IS OBVIOUS THE INSTRUCTOR PLT (IP) IS NOT MAINTAINING CONTROL OF HIS TRAINEE/ACFT. IN A HIGH PERFORMANCE MIL JET, THIS IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE AND VERY DANGEROUS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.