Narrative:

I was working 3 sectors combined on 1 scope, working approximately 8 to 10 aircraft. Air carrier X DH8 checked onto the frequency at 10000', requesting to proceed direct phf. I instructed air carrier X to 'descend and maintain 4000', proceed direct phf, amend altitude maintain 8000' direct phf.' in air carrier X's readback I heard 8000' and assumed it was correct. Later I observed air carrier X leaving 6400'. I asked air carrier X to 'say altitude' and he reported 'out of 6000 for 4000'.' I advised air carrier X that his altitude had been amended to 8000', but now he could continue to 4000' direct phf. There were several VFR aircraft in the vicinity as well as one IFR aircraft overflt aircraft at 7000'. At no time did I observe less than standard sep between air carrier and any other aircraft. I reported air carrier X to my supervisor as a possible pilot deviation. After reviewing the tape 4 or 5 times, I was finally able to ascertain air carrier X's readback: 'ok, out of 8000' direct phf and we're down to 4000'.' I had assumed the readback to say 'down to 8000', direct phf.' on the tape the readback was difficult to understand and the lack of standard phraseology may have contributed to the hearback error. Also, at the time the workload was moderate and complex.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CTLR FAILED TO HEAR READBACK OF WRONG ASSIGNED ALT. OPERATIONAL DEVIATION.

Narrative: I WAS WORKING 3 SECTORS COMBINED ON 1 SCOPE, WORKING APPROX 8 TO 10 ACFT. ACR X DH8 CHKED ONTO THE FREQ AT 10000', REQUESTING TO PROCEED DIRECT PHF. I INSTRUCTED ACR X TO 'DSND AND MAINTAIN 4000', PROCEED DIRECT PHF, AMEND ALT MAINTAIN 8000' DIRECT PHF.' IN ACR X'S READBACK I HEARD 8000' AND ASSUMED IT WAS CORRECT. LATER I OBSERVED ACR X LEAVING 6400'. I ASKED ACR X TO 'SAY ALT' AND HE RPTED 'OUT OF 6000 FOR 4000'.' I ADVISED ACR X THAT HIS ALT HAD BEEN AMENDED TO 8000', BUT NOW HE COULD CONTINUE TO 4000' DIRECT PHF. THERE WERE SEVERAL VFR ACFT IN THE VICINITY AS WELL AS ONE IFR ACFT OVERFLT ACFT AT 7000'. AT NO TIME DID I OBSERVE LESS THAN STANDARD SEP BTWN ACR AND ANY OTHER ACFT. I RPTED ACR X TO MY SUPVR AS A POSSIBLE PLT DEVIATION. AFTER REVIEWING THE TAPE 4 OR 5 TIMES, I WAS FINALLY ABLE TO ASCERTAIN ACR X'S READBACK: 'OK, OUT OF 8000' DIRECT PHF AND WE'RE DOWN TO 4000'.' I HAD ASSUMED THE READBACK TO SAY 'DOWN TO 8000', DIRECT PHF.' ON THE TAPE THE READBACK WAS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND AND THE LACK OF STANDARD PHRASEOLOGY MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE HEARBACK ERROR. ALSO, AT THE TIME THE WORKLOAD WAS MODERATE AND COMPLEX.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.