![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1281274 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201507 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZGSZ.Airport | 
| State Reference | FO | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B777-200 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Taxi | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Aero Charts | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying  | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance Ground Incursion Taxiway  | 
Narrative:
After pushback from gate and while facing north on K in shenzhen we were cleared to taxi via K2; a; hold short of A5--which we did. We were subsequently cleared via 'route 1'; D; C1; and holding point 15. Both of us were unfamiliar with 'route 1' and we questioned tower who; after a bit of discussion; cleared us via A5; south; D; C1 (just prior to this clearance; the controller advised us that A5; south is 'route 1'). At cruise; we both read all of our available charts and checked the notams again. There are no 'routes' defined but there is a note to reference the 10-9 pages for runway crossing routes. This reference is in section 1.4.2 on the 10-P1 page.additionally; the turn from K onto A5 is a hard left turn onto a wrong way high speed exit. The taxiway appears wide enough but requires a great deal of judgmental oversteer--a heavy airplane would require more than normal taxi power. ATC is issuing 'standard' clearances that aren't on our charts. We need a new plan and charts (or a notam) that describe these taxi routes if they are; in fact; still valid.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZGSZ Ground Control cleared a B777 to taxi K2; A; Hold Short of A5 then via Route 1; D; C1; Holding Point 15. The crew found no Route 1 or published taxi routes on any available charts.
Narrative: After pushback from gate and while facing north on K in Shenzhen we were cleared to taxi via K2; A; Hold Short of A5--which we did. We were subsequently cleared via 'Route 1'; D; C1; and holding point 15. Both of us were unfamiliar with 'Route 1' and we questioned tower who; after a bit of discussion; cleared us via A5; S; D; C1 (Just prior to this clearance; the controller advised us that A5; S is 'Route 1'). At cruise; we both read all of our available charts and checked the notams again. There are no 'Routes' defined but there is a note to reference the 10-9 pages for runway crossing routes. This reference is in section 1.4.2 on the 10-P1 page.Additionally; the turn from K onto A5 is a hard left turn onto a wrong way high speed exit. The taxiway appears wide enough but requires a great deal of judgmental oversteer--a heavy airplane would require more than normal taxi power. ATC is issuing 'standard' clearances that aren't on our charts. We need a new plan and charts (or a notam) that describe these taxi routes if they are; in fact; still valid.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.