Narrative:

I was working the radar position at sector 20. When I attempted to enter an interim altitude of FL240 on aircraft mlt X, the response of the computer to my entry was that it cancelled the track on the aircraft. A 'dart' was run and it showed that I entered a 'drop track' message. However, I do not believe that to be true. I remember entering FL240 and the cid #, and I'm pretty certain that I hit the 'interim altitude' button. There is a considerable distance between that button and the 'cancel track' button. I believe that the error was made by the equipment. I also know of similar incidents in the past involving a 'drop track,' resulting from an attempted 'interim altitude' message. If this were to occur during busy traffic, the controller could forget about the aircraft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: COMPUTER TRACK OF ACFT ON RADAR SCOPE INADVERTENTLY CANCELLED.

Narrative: I WAS WORKING THE RADAR POS AT SECTOR 20. WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO ENTER AN INTERIM ALT OF FL240 ON ACFT MLT X, THE RESPONSE OF THE COMPUTER TO MY ENTRY WAS THAT IT CANCELLED THE TRACK ON THE ACFT. A 'DART' WAS RUN AND IT SHOWED THAT I ENTERED A 'DROP TRACK' MESSAGE. HOWEVER, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT TO BE TRUE. I REMEMBER ENTERING FL240 AND THE CID #, AND I'M PRETTY CERTAIN THAT I HIT THE 'INTERIM ALT' BUTTON. THERE IS A CONSIDERABLE DISTANCE BTWN THAT BUTTON AND THE 'CANCEL TRACK' BUTTON. I BELIEVE THAT THE ERROR WAS MADE BY THE EQUIP. I ALSO KNOW OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS IN THE PAST INVOLVING A 'DROP TRACK,' RESULTING FROM AN ATTEMPTED 'INTERIM ALT' MESSAGE. IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR DURING BUSY TFC, THE CTLR COULD FORGET ABOUT THE ACFT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.