 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Hcf controller describes situation where an a conflict arises due to a bad clearance issued by clearance delivery at the tower of departure.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1203317 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201409 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | HCF.TRACON |
| State Reference | HI |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Military Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 21 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
I was working R3 position; with aircraft at 5000 to maui; and another aircraft at 7000 to mkk. I had just given descent to aircraft Y to 6000; and R4 position calls me up on the override; and says aircraft X turning right heading 180. I think I mentioned the traffic; aircraft Y; but then I noticed the aircraft X on my scope; heading right toward aircraft Y; and then in a right turn. I tried to call traffic; but then the aircraft X was southbound. I think there was only 3 miles between them at the closest point; both at 7000.the pilot of aircraft X should fly his filed flight plan; and ask if he is unsure of his routing. The flight plans filed would not be able to be flown as filed; due to the low altitude; with MVA's at 12;000 along his filed route of flight. The tower controller should have noticed that the flight plan had AR901 in it as a routing; which is a refueling route; and needs an oceanic clearance; not a silent clearance. Aircraft X should not be doing VFR flight low level at 500 feet between the islands sight seeing. This is wrong and a dangerous waste of tax payer money. There are too many VFR aircraft in the areas that he did fly after he canceled IFR; that would not be able to get out of his way; and he may not see to get out of their way.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HCF Controller describes situation where an a conflict arises due to a bad clearance issued by Clearance Delivery at the Tower of departure.
Narrative: I was working R3 position; with aircraft at 5000 to Maui; and another aircraft at 7000 to MKK. I had just given descent to Aircraft Y to 6000; and R4 position calls me up on the override; and says Aircraft X turning right heading 180. I think I mentioned the traffic; Aircraft Y; but then I noticed the Aircraft X on my scope; heading right toward Aircraft Y; and then in a right turn. I tried to call traffic; but then the Aircraft X was southbound. I think there was only 3 miles between them at the closest point; both at 7000.The pilot of Aircraft X should fly his filed flight plan; and ask if he is unsure of his routing. The flight plans filed would not be able to be flown as filed; due to the low altitude; with MVA's at 12;000 along his filed route of flight. The tower controller should have noticed that the flight plan had AR901 in it as a routing; which is a refueling route; and needs an oceanic clearance; not a silent clearance. Aircraft X should not be doing VFR flight low level at 500 feet between the islands sight seeing. This is wrong and a dangerous waste of tax payer money. There are too many VFR aircraft in the areas that he did fly after he canceled IFR; that would not be able to get out of his way; and he may not see to get out of their way.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.