![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 115697 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 198906 | 
| Day | Thu | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | atc facility : adm | 
| State Reference | OK | 
| Altitude | msl bound lower : 35000 msl bound upper : 35000  | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zkc tower : sac  | 
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier | 
| Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng | 
| Flight Phase | cruise other | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Operator | other | 
| Make Model Name | Military Transport | 
| Navigation In Use | Other | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic  | 
| Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : flight engineer  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 20 flight time total : 9300 flight time type : 20  | 
| ASRS Report | 115697 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : first officer | 
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | other anomaly other | 
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa | 
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact | 
| Consequence | Other | 
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
Shortly after leveloff at cruise, first officer heard an mlt callup and recognized the call sign as one from his 'old unit' and he said he wondered if 'so-and-so' was still there, followed immediately by him asking the mlt to come up 123.45. I had a somewhat vague feeling that frequency was restr and said so. He assured me that he had used it a lot in military air command, no questions asked. I should have told him not to do it just on grounds of not being very professional, but let him go ahead, and he was on it (123.45) about a minute. Found out later, checking with 'the guy in the office', that my vague feeling was caused by an operations bulletin about 7 months ago, stating that frequency is illegal for air-to-air. Have since spoken to first officer and myself about never doing that again.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLT CREW MEMBER USED RESTRICTED FREQ TO COMMUNICATE WITH 'OLD UNIT' WHEN HEARD CALL TO CENTER.
Narrative: SHORTLY AFTER LEVELOFF AT CRUISE, F/O HEARD AN MLT CALLUP AND RECOGNIZED THE CALL SIGN AS ONE FROM HIS 'OLD UNIT' AND HE SAID HE WONDERED IF 'SO-AND-SO' WAS STILL THERE, FOLLOWED IMMEDIATELY BY HIM ASKING THE MLT TO COME UP 123.45. I HAD A SOMEWHAT VAGUE FEELING THAT FREQ WAS RESTR AND SAID SO. HE ASSURED ME THAT HE HAD USED IT A LOT IN MIL AIR COMMAND, NO QUESTIONS ASKED. I SHOULD HAVE TOLD HIM NOT TO DO IT JUST ON GROUNDS OF NOT BEING VERY PROFESSIONAL, BUT LET HIM GO AHEAD, AND HE WAS ON IT (123.45) ABOUT A MINUTE. FOUND OUT LATER, CHECKING WITH 'THE GUY IN THE OFFICE', THAT MY VAGUE FEELING WAS CAUSED BY AN OPERATIONS BULLETIN ABOUT 7 MONTHS AGO, STATING THAT FREQ IS ILLEGAL FOR AIR-TO-AIR. HAVE SINCE SPOKEN TO F/O AND MYSELF ABOUT NEVER DOING THAT AGAIN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.