![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1133957 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201312 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Tower | 
| State Reference | US | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC | 
| Light | Night | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER/LR | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | FMS/FMC | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying  | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Person 2 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy  | 
Narrative:
Inside the final approach fix for runway 22; first officer noticed that we were below glideslope. The autopilot was engaged and approach selected tracking the localizer however; unbeknownst to us; the VNAV was in pitch mode. The first officer brought this fact to my attention and I added power and began to climb to re-intercept the glideslope. Approximately the same time; I intercepted the glideslope we broke out VMC conditions and had the runway and PAPI insight. We performed a visual landing.believing the autopilot had captured the ILS correctly; I relied too heavily on automation and failed to keep my scan going. I must keep in mind that the buttons in the flight guidance panel are myth and what displays on the pfd is truth. Meaning-- I can't rely on the aircraft to do what I command by simply pressing a button on the flight guidance panel. I must verify the plane is doing what I command by what is displayed on the pfd. I must also keep my scan going and not get complacent.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-145 flight crew descended below the glideslope inside the Final Approach Fix; but corrected back to the glideslope after discovering that the VNAV was in pitch mode.
Narrative: Inside the final approach fix for Runway 22; First Officer noticed that we were below glideslope. The autopilot was engaged and approach selected tracking the localizer however; unbeknownst to us; the VNAV was in pitch mode. The First Officer brought this fact to my attention and I added power and began to climb to re-intercept the glideslope. Approximately the same time; I intercepted the glideslope we broke out VMC conditions and had the runway and PAPI insight. We performed a visual landing.Believing the autopilot had captured the ILS correctly; I relied too heavily on automation and failed to keep my scan going. I must keep in mind that the buttons in the flight guidance panel are myth and what displays on the PFD is truth. Meaning-- I can't rely on the aircraft to do what I command by simply pressing a button on the flight guidance panel. I must verify the plane is doing what I command by what is displayed on the PFD. I must also keep my scan going and not get complacent.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.