![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1044902 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201210 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | S46.TRACON |
| State Reference | WA |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B737-800 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Route In Use | Other Instrument Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | B737-900 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Route In Use | Other Instrument Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Approach Departure |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
B737-800 was vectored to an ILS runway 16L approach and cleared for such. B737-900 was vectored in behind B737-800 with the intent to conduct a dual dependent ILS approach to runway 16R. I had established vertical separation while vectoring the B737-900 onto the final approach course. We were using 'fused' radar display which has an undesirable characteristic of 'target hopping'; an erratic flight path. I misjudged the distance and turned the aircraft in too close to successfully complete the approach. I broke him off to the southwest when I determined it would not work out. Separation was lost during the escape maneuver. Fusion radar sometimes causes a track to display as much as 1/2 mile from actual position. I have seen 'jumps' into adjacent finals followed by accurate depiction of aircraft position. I misjudged rate of turn and wind effects in this situation. [I need to] be more conservative in vectoring aircraft into position for dual-dependent ILS approaches; particularly during wind conditions such as were present.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: S46 Controller expressed concern regarding the operational characteristic of 'FUSED' RADAR; noting the targets 'jump' making it difficult to insure proper instructions are issued.
Narrative: B737-800 was vectored to an ILS Runway 16L approach and cleared for such. B737-900 was vectored in behind B737-800 with the intent to conduct a dual dependent ILS approach to Runway 16R. I had established vertical separation while vectoring the B737-900 onto the final approach course. We were using 'FUSED' RADAR display which has an undesirable characteristic of 'target hopping'; an erratic flight path. I misjudged the distance and turned the aircraft in too close to successfully complete the approach. I broke him off to the southwest when I determined it would not work out. Separation was lost during the escape maneuver. FUSION RADAR sometimes causes a track to display as much as 1/2 mile from actual position. I have seen 'jumps' into adjacent finals followed by accurate depiction of aircraft position. I misjudged rate of turn and wind effects in this situation. [I need to] be more conservative in vectoring aircraft into position for dual-dependent ILS approaches; particularly during wind conditions such as were present.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.