Narrative:

On approach conditions were favorable for windshear and were flying about reference plus 5 to 10 KTS; and had briefed for windshear. Turbulence was light and little crab was necessary to maintain alignment. At about 100 AGL hit a little bit of chop but speed did not go below reference. Entered ground effect and with engines spooling down and was expecting to hear the 50; 40; 30; 20; 10; call; but instead got a windshear warning. [We were] considering energy state of aircraft and proximity to runway; and in a good position to land normally. Judgment was made to continue to land. I felt that it was safer to land than to go around at this point of the landing. If same events were to happen maybe 10 to 15 seconds prior I would have executed the windshear escape maneuver.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CRJ90 Captain continued to a normal landing after the WINDSHEAR WARNING alerted while the aircraft was beginning the landing flare at 100 FT.

Narrative: On approach conditions were favorable for windshear and were flying about REF plus 5 to 10 KTS; and had briefed for windshear. Turbulence was light and little crab was necessary to maintain alignment. At about 100 AGL hit a little bit of chop but speed did not go below REF. Entered ground effect and with engines spooling down and was expecting to hear the 50; 40; 30; 20; 10; call; but instead got a windshear warning. [We were] considering energy state of aircraft and proximity to runway; and in a good position to land normally. Judgment was made to continue to land. I felt that it was safer to land than to go around at this point of the landing. If same events were to happen maybe 10 to 15 seconds prior I would have executed the windshear escape maneuver.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.