![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 968240 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201109 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Beechjet 400 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Rain Repellent System |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
Upon arrival at destination; a diversion was executed to low ceilings and heavy rain. The visibility and ceilings were reported such that an approach should be successful. However; after reaching the MDA and map; we could not locate the runway. It was mostly due to the lower than reported ceilings; yet the visibility through the windshield was so poor due to the rain; it would have been tough to see the runway with high ceilings in a light-heavy rain condition. The repellent had obviously failed to shed any water to make visibility acceptable in amount of rain. Not sure if there is a schedule for reapplication of the special rain repellent used on the beechjet planes; but it would be a good idea to make it part of a routine maintenance cycle (say; between a certain duration of time on the plane or calendar time). Also; if there was a recommended test we could perform as a flight crew as a preflight inspection when accepting the aircraft or before flight to/from airports with forecast or actual rain conditions; that would help alleviate a possible emergency situation and perhaps any unnecessary diversions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A BE-400XP crew could not see the runway at minimums; resulting in a missed approach and diversion. Reporter stated the rain repellent system failed to clear the windshield during heavy rain.
Narrative: Upon arrival at destination; a diversion was executed to low ceilings and heavy rain. The visibility and ceilings were reported such that an approach should be successful. However; after reaching the MDA and MAP; we could not locate the runway. It was mostly due to the lower than reported ceilings; yet the visibility through the windshield was so poor due to the rain; it would have been tough to see the runway with high ceilings in a light-heavy rain condition. The repellent had obviously failed to shed any water to make visibility acceptable in amount of rain. Not sure if there is a schedule for reapplication of the special rain repellent used on the BeechJet planes; but it would be a good idea to make it part of a routine maintenance cycle (say; between a certain duration of time on the plane or calendar time). Also; if there was a recommended test we could perform as a flight crew as a preflight inspection when accepting the aircraft or before flight to/from airports with forecast or actual rain conditions; that would help alleviate a possible emergency situation and perhaps any unnecessary diversions.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.