Narrative:

I was released from the tower and contacted point mugu approach from who I received VFR flight following; radar traffic advisories and received a transponder code. The controller called out some traffic for me a few times that were not really factors and I reported contacts on both.at 3;000 ft; I leveled off to clear the area prior to continuing the climb and; within seconds; spotted a PA-32R at my 12:00 on a directly opposite course and the same altitude closing at less than three football fields. I banked hard to the right; pulled power and dove. The PA-32 passed off to my left. He never changed course or altitude; and I believe he never saw me. At the time of my evasive maneuver I was about 600 ft from the PA-32 and maybe 300 ft when it passed off to my left. I never got a warning of this traffic from mugu approach. When I notified them of the near collision; they had no comment.in the future I will continue to lower my nose to clear the area during climbs but it will be between VFR and IFR cruising altitudes (e.g.; 2;700 ft; or 3;300 ft; etc.). This may provide a little more safety margin if there is a possible collision factor with someone in cruise or cruise transition. Also; I will try to avoid direct routes to and from airports while climbing and descending.I know approach and ATC have there hands full at times; but I thought they had collision warning alarms and other practices in place when planes were converging at very close distances; especially at the same altitude; and if one or two of them are in contact and have assigned transponder codes. I would hope that lack of warning in cases like this is an anomaly and that all the aforementioned practices and tools in place are consistently being used.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C-152 pilot experienced an NMAC with a PA-32 while on flight following with ATC.

Narrative: I was released from the Tower and contacted Point Mugu Approach from who I received VFR flight following; radar traffic advisories and received a transponder code. The Controller called out some traffic for me a few times that were not really factors and I reported contacts on both.At 3;000 FT; I leveled off to clear the area prior to continuing the climb and; within seconds; spotted a PA-32R at my 12:00 on a directly opposite course and the same altitude closing at less than three football fields. I banked hard to the right; pulled power and dove. The PA-32 passed off to my left. He never changed course or altitude; and I believe he never saw me. At the time of my evasive maneuver I was about 600 FT from the PA-32 and maybe 300 FT when it passed off to my left. I never got a warning of this traffic from Mugu Approach. When I notified them of the near collision; they had no comment.In the future I will continue to lower my nose to clear the area during climbs but it will be between VFR and IFR cruising altitudes (e.g.; 2;700 FT; or 3;300 FT; etc.). This may provide a little more safety margin if there is a possible collision factor with someone in cruise or cruise transition. Also; I will try to avoid direct routes to and from airports while climbing and descending.I know Approach and ATC have there hands full at times; but I thought they had collision warning alarms and other practices in place when planes were converging at very close distances; especially at the same altitude; and if one or two of them are in contact and have assigned transponder codes. I would hope that lack of warning in cases like this is an anomaly and that all the aforementioned practices and tools in place are consistently being used.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.