A student pilot and his/her instructor; flying a practice VOR approach in a da-40; experienced an ne...

Attributes
ACN	956131
Time
Date	201106
Local Time Of Day	0601-1200
Place
Locale Reference	ZZZ.Airport
State Reference	US
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	DA40 Diamond Star
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Final Approach
Route In Use	Other VOR Runway XX
Flight Plan	None
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	PA-28 Cherokee/Archer/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Initial Climb
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Function	Instructor Pilot Not Flying
Qualification	Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Commercial
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 200 Flight Crew Total 2200 Flight Crew Type 450
Events
Anomaly	Conflict NMAC
Miss Distance	Horizontal 100 Vertical 100

Narrative:

On final for a VOR training approach; I made radio calls over the VOR inbound on the approach; at 'the highway' inbound; and a two mile final call for low approach only. We were between a mile and a mile and a half out when I noticed PA28 traffic on upwind. The traffic on upwind had made a call for final for his previous landing; but had not mentioned in his radio call what type of landing he was doing. I saw the traffic on upwind and made an evasive climbing right turn to avoid him.the pilot of the other aircraft acknowledged that he had forgotten to make an upwind radio call after we had both regained separation from each other. I feel that the problem here was simply a breakdown in radio communications due to the student pilot in the other aircraft not stating his type of landing intentions or making a radio call on upwind. A discussion between myself and the instructor of the in the PA28 will be the corrective action.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A student pilot and his/her Instructor; flying a practice VOR approach in a DA-40; experienced an NMAC with a PA28 piloted by another student and his/her Instructor who had failed to make appropriate position and intention CTAF advisories following a preceding touch and go.

Narrative: On final for a VOR training approach; I made radio calls over the VOR inbound on the approach; at 'the highway' inbound; and a two mile final call for low approach only. We were between a mile and a mile and a half out when I noticed PA28 traffic on upwind. The traffic on upwind had made a call for final for his previous landing; but had not mentioned in his radio call what type of landing he was doing. I saw the traffic on upwind and made an evasive climbing right turn to avoid him.The pilot of the other aircraft acknowledged that he had forgotten to make an upwind radio call after we had both regained separation from each other. I feel that the problem here was simply a breakdown in radio communications due to the student pilot in the other aircraft not stating his type of landing intentions or making a radio call on upwind. A discussion between myself and the Instructor of the in the PA28 will be the corrective action.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

A student pilot and his/her instructor; flying a practice VOR approach in a da-40; experienced an near midair collision with a PA28 piloted by another student and his/her instructor who had failed to make appropriate position and intention CTAF advisories following a preceding touch and go.