![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 949363 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201105 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport | 
| State Reference | US | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | Landing | 
| Route In Use | None | 
| Flight Plan | None | 
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | Tail Boom | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Instructor | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor  | 
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 360 Flight Crew Total 6500 Flight Crew Type 1500  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Ground Strike - Aircraft  | 
Narrative:
I was giving a dual flight to a student in a 2005 G1000 cessna 172. It was his first flight in a G1000 aircraft and we were on an orientation flight. He has soloed recently and we were doing some additional dual work. We started the flight by performing some air work; giving him an opportunity to get a feel for the late model aircraft before doing some touch and goes at an outlying field. He commented [that] it flew like a ferrari in comparison to the 30 year old airplanes he's been flying. He had a tendency to over-rotate a few times which we worked on correcting. Upon returning to our departure airport he over-rotated again on landing this time scraping the tail skid. The tower queried us as to whether we had struck the tail; which I acknowledged in the affirmative. We parked the aircraft to await a maintenance inspection. Maintenance found nothing wrong with the aircraft. This is a part 61 student who is coming along very well. We reviewed takeoff and landings the last two flights and the over-rotating tendency is gone. It appears this shouldn't be a problem again. I'm using this situation as a training experience to introduce him to NASA reports and NTSB 830.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A licensed pilot with an Instructor was flying a new C172 and had a tendency to over rotate which resulted in a tail strike on one landing; but Maintenance found no damage.
Narrative: I was giving a dual flight to a student in a 2005 G1000 Cessna 172. It was his first flight in a G1000 aircraft and we were on an orientation flight. He has soloed recently and we were doing some additional dual work. We started the flight by performing some air work; giving him an opportunity to get a feel for the late model aircraft before doing some touch and goes at an outlying field. He commented [that] it flew like a Ferrari in comparison to the 30 year old airplanes he's been flying. He had a tendency to over-rotate a few times which we worked on correcting. Upon returning to our departure airport he over-rotated again on landing this time scraping the tail skid. The Tower queried us as to whether we had struck the tail; which I acknowledged in the affirmative. We parked the aircraft to await a Maintenance inspection. Maintenance found nothing wrong with the aircraft. This is a Part 61 student who is coming along very well. We reviewed takeoff and landings the last two flights and the over-rotating tendency is gone. It appears this shouldn't be a problem again. I'm using this situation as a training experience to introduce him to NASA reports and NTSB 830.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.