![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 948027 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201105 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZBW.ARTCC |
| State Reference | NH |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Eagle (F-15) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 129 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Enroute |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Canada (drummond sector) called with a non-automated hand off on a flight of 3/F15's on a vector. I asked for the equipment qualifier and the drummond controller said 'tango uniform;' which is not a qualifier. When I questioned him; he said it might be different from canada to the us. I accepted radar contact; started a track on the 3 F15s. I told the radar controller to verify the equipment qualifier. An F15 said he was 'slant india'. I entered the code into the flight plan. A few minutes later the F15s and a B737 were flashing conflict alert about 30 miles apart. The radar controller and myself both evaluated it. We spoke about the flashing. I stated that it may be from three in the flight. The radar controller issued traffic. I don't recall a coral box that indicated non-rvsm. Recommendation; I recommend that the same equipment qualifiers be used between canada and the us. I also believe that it would be helpful if the drummond controller would have coordinated a non-rvsm aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Enroute Controller described a Conflict Alert event involving a flight of military aircraft being transfered from the Canadian ATC system to the US; noting the confused 'qualifier' (slant) designators between the two ATC systems should be corrected.
Narrative: Canada (Drummond Sector) called with a non-automated hand off on a flight of 3/F15's on a vector. I asked for the equipment qualifier and the Drummond Controller said 'Tango Uniform;' which is not a qualifier. When I questioned him; he said it might be different from Canada to the US. I accepted RADAR contact; started a track on the 3 F15s. I told the RADAR Controller to verify the equipment qualifier. An F15 said he was 'Slant India'. I entered the code into the flight plan. A few minutes later the F15s and a B737 were flashing Conflict Alert about 30 miles apart. The RADAR Controller and myself both evaluated it. We spoke about the flashing. I stated that it may be from three in the flight. The RADAR Controller issued traffic. I don't recall a coral box that indicated Non-RVSM. Recommendation; I recommend that the same equipment qualifiers be used between Canada and the US. I also believe that it would be helpful if the Drummond Controller would have coordinated a Non-RVSM aircraft.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.