Poor CRM skills proved to be the likely culprit for the failure of a g-iv flight crew to comply with...

Narrative:

On departure the pilot flying did not turn left to 280 per the teb 6 SID. ATC inquired at approximately 5 DME as the turn was to have been made at 2.3 DME. We immediately initiated the turn as I responded that we were in the turn. There was no other mention of this from the controller and we are not aware of any conflicts arising from it.I believe several factors led to this event:*this was the first time the pilot flying and I had ever flown together as we had just met the day before.*the pilot flying obtained the ATIS and clearance at which time I specifically asked if he intended to use LNAV/VNAV for the SID? He emphatically stated that he wanted to decide when the aircraft turns and proceeded to brief the SID.*during the taxi we were assigned a new runway for departure. I started to look at the SID again as he again briefed the highlights of the SID including the altitudes; DME and turn.*no headset/intercom was utilized by the pilot flying. I had the headset on but left ear piece pushed back.*the efb's are not yoke mounted and mine slipped off my leg to the side during the takeoff.*the g-iv sp co-pilots flight director disappears at 1;000-2;000 ft thus not depicting what is in the FMS.*the pilot in command later stated that once ATC had assigned 4;000 ft; he thought that we would be issued a turn 'anytime.'having executed this SID numerous times before in aircraft and the simulator; this event stresses the importance of thorough CRM and complete briefings. Acting as a contract pilot; it is imperative that if I have a doubt or feel strongly about an issue that I clearly voice my concern.note: on subsequent legs; the pilot flying used the LNAV/VNAV feature of the guidance panel and autopilot systems.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Poor CRM skills proved to be the likely culprit for the failure of a G-IV flight crew to comply with the lateral navigation track directed by the Teterboro SID from TEB.

Narrative: On departure the pilot flying did not turn left to 280 per the TEB 6 SID. ATC inquired at approximately 5 DME as the turn was to have been made at 2.3 DME. We immediately initiated the turn as I responded that we were in the turn. There was no other mention of this from the controller and we are not aware of any conflicts arising from it.I believe several factors led to this event:*This was the first time the pilot flying and I had ever flown together as we had just met the day before.*The pilot flying obtained the ATIS and Clearance at which time I specifically asked if he intended to use LNAV/VNAV for the SID? He emphatically stated that he wanted to decide when the aircraft turns and proceeded to brief the SID.*During the taxi we were assigned a new Runway for departure. I started to look at the SID again as he again briefed the highlights of the SID including the Altitudes; DME and Turn.*No headset/intercom was utilized by the pilot flying. I had the headset on but left ear piece pushed back.*The EFB's are NOT yoke mounted and mine slipped off my leg to the side during the takeoff.*The G-IV SP co-pilots flight director disappears at 1;000-2;000 FT thus not depicting what is in the FMS.*The Pilot in Command later stated that once ATC had assigned 4;000 FT; he thought that we would be issued a turn 'anytime.'Having executed this SID numerous times before in aircraft and the simulator; this event STRESSES the importance of thorough CRM and complete briefings. Acting as a contract pilot; it is imperative that if I have a doubt or feel strongly about an issue that I clearly voice my concern.Note: On subsequent legs; the pilot flying used the LNAV/VNAV feature of the Guidance Panel and Autopilot systems.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	944330
Time
Date	201104
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	TEB.Airport
State Reference	NJ
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Gulfstream IV / G350 / G450
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Initial Climb
Route In Use	SID TEB 6
Flight Plan	IFR
Component
Aircraft Component	Autoflight System
Person 1
Function	Pilot Not Flying First Officer
Qualification	Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 100 Flight Crew Total 6500 Flight Crew Type 250
Events
Anomaly	Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types Flight Deck / Cabin / Aircraft Event Other / Unknown

Poor CRM skills proved to be the likely culprit for the failure of a g-iv flight crew to comply with the lateral navigation track directed by the teterboro SID from teb.