![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 937305 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201102 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ROA.Airport |
| State Reference | VA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
Descending into roa approach pointed out airport and said call in sight. We saw it slightly to our northwest and called it in sight. It was a dark night and we knew there were mountains; but they were hard to see. Approach cleared us for the visual approach to runway 24 [and to] contact tower. We were then approximately on a mid-field left downwind for 24. Kept it long and wide for the mountains; but then going through the valley we got a terrain GPWS warning. We kept the airplane on a high final and landed safely.we had misread the company policy prohibiting visual approaches until establish on part of a published approach. Very dark night made it even more difficult; too. We need better adherence with procedures at special airports; to be careful of complacency; and to completely read all special airport operational restrictions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CRJ-200 flight crew accepted a night visual approach to ROA while on downwind to the runway in contravention to company policy which restricts acceptance of visual clearances only after established on a published approach. An EGPWS terrain warning resulted; but was ignored.
Narrative: Descending into ROA Approach pointed out airport and said call in sight. We saw it slightly to our northwest and called it in sight. It was a dark night and we knew there were mountains; but they were hard to see. Approach cleared us for the visual approach to Runway 24 [and to] contact Tower. We were then approximately on a mid-field left downwind for 24. Kept it long and wide for the mountains; but then going through the valley we got a terrain GPWS warning. We kept the airplane on a high final and landed safely.We had misread the company policy prohibiting visual approaches until establish on part of a published approach. Very dark night made it even more difficult; too. We need better adherence with procedures at special airports; to be careful of complacency; and to completely read all special airport operational restrictions.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.