![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 928168 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201101 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | VGT.Airport |
| State Reference | NV |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Baron 55/Cochise |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | SID NOTWN2 |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Component | |
| Aircraft Component | GPS & Other Satellite Navigation |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Single Pilot |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 25 Flight Crew Total 5000 Flight Crew Type 3000 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
The problem arose after I departed runway 25 at vgt. I immediately noticed that the flight path did not display on my GPS screen nor on my pfd flight display. The las vegas approach controller asked about my incorrect flight path. I had made a right turn but did not have navigation steering to the published 313 degree radial. I was told that I was not on course. My onboard GPS displayed ruzco intersection to the west and I steered to it. Upon crossing ruzco I executed a turn to the right to reverse direction to las VORTAC which was the next fix on the SID. My altitude was in a climb to 5;000 ft MSL. ATC said I was not on the published las radial of 320 degrees and gave me a heading. The rest of the flight was uneventful except that in the vicinity of the bld VORTAC; ATC gave me a number to call after landing. I called and was told that a pilot deviation had been filed by the previous controller; who was now off duty. I had been scheduled for a recurrent training program. It includes ground school with a heavy concentration on GPS systems; and 4 hours of instruction in the pilot's airplane. Use of the GPS/pfd flight display was covered in detail. My perceptions with regard to this incident are that I should always have ready VOR backup in the event of glass panel failures/problems and that more frequent training opportunities are very important. Factors affecting my performance include that I was in transition from a king/pn-101 system to the GPS/pfd flight display; and I was just beginning to use approach plates on a tablet. One action not taken was to cancel IFR at the first instance and return to vgt for situation analysis on the ground. I completed the recurrent training program successfully and have a fresh biennial and instrument competency check. I am confident that I am now able to more effectively deal with this type of problem; be it equipment and/or human factors.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE55 pilot reports deviating from the NOTWN2 departure from VGT due to possible malfunction or incorrect programing of new glass flight displays.
Narrative: The problem arose after I departed Runway 25 at VGT. I immediately noticed that the flight path did not display on my GPS screen nor on my PFD Flight Display. The Las Vegas Approach Controller asked about my incorrect flight path. I had made a right turn but did not have NAV steering to the published 313 degree radial. I was told that I was not on course. My onboard GPS displayed RUZCO Intersection to the west and I steered to it. Upon crossing RUZCO I executed a turn to the right to reverse direction to LAS VORTAC which was the next fix on the SID. My altitude was in a climb to 5;000 FT MSL. ATC said I was not on the published LAS radial of 320 degrees and gave me a heading. The rest of the flight was uneventful except that in the vicinity of the BLD VORTAC; ATC gave me a number to call after landing. I called and was told that a pilot deviation had been filed by the previous controller; who was now off duty. I had been scheduled for a recurrent training program. It includes ground school with a heavy concentration on GPS systems; and 4 hours of instruction in the pilot's airplane. Use of the GPS/PFD Flight Display was covered in detail. My perceptions with regard to this incident are that I should always have ready VOR backup in the event of glass panel failures/problems and that more frequent training opportunities are very important. Factors affecting my performance include that I was in transition from a King/PN-101 system to the GPS/PFD Flight Display; and I was just beginning to use approach plates on a tablet. One action not taken was to cancel IFR at the first instance and return to VGT for situation analysis on the ground. I completed the recurrent training program successfully and have a fresh biennial and instrument competency check. I am confident that I am now able to more effectively deal with this type of problem; be it equipment and/or human factors.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.