Narrative:

When I relieved another controller the loss of sep had already occurred. An mlt was on 5 mi final, visual approach, on lfi tower frequency. An fgt was on 7 mi final, PAR approach, on lfi rfc frequency. The problem was discovered when the flight had to go around and lfi tower supervisor called orf area manager and complained. When I received my relief briefing, I was told these 2 aircraft were talking to lfi. I assumed they were being separated.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FGT, ON PAR APCH, OVERTOOK SLOWER MLT IN FINAL APCH COURSE RESULTING IN LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.

Narrative: WHEN I RELIEVED ANOTHER CTLR THE LOSS OF SEP HAD ALREADY OCCURRED. AN MLT WAS ON 5 MI FINAL, VISUAL APCH, ON LFI TWR FREQ. AN FGT WAS ON 7 MI FINAL, PAR APCH, ON LFI RFC FREQ. THE PROB WAS DISCOVERED WHEN THE FLT HAD TO GO AROUND AND LFI TWR SUPVR CALLED ORF AREA MGR AND COMPLAINED. WHEN I RECEIVED MY RELIEF BRIEFING, I WAS TOLD THESE 2 ACFT WERE TALKING TO LFI. I ASSUMED THEY WERE BEING SEPARATED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.