![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 923122 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201012 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B737-700 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Landing |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 187 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
While on a visual approach for runway 27; we received a wind shear warning at approximately 500 ft. We initiated a go-around and told the tower we were going around for a wind shear warning. The tower gave us a heading of 290 and told us to contact departure. We came back around for a normal landing on runway 27. When we landed; we were asked to call the tower supervisor. The tower supervisor informed me that we had done nothing wrong; however; we were the second company aircraft to go around for wind shear with no weather in the area. I told him it is company policy to go around for a wind shear warning. He stated he was aware of that policy but asked me to pass on to the company that its causes a problem for the tower when they are landing 27 and taking off on 22. He asked me if the company could take a look at the equipment in the airplane or our policy on go-arounds. I told him I would. The ATC coordinator told me that he was aware of the problem.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air Carrier on approach executed a go around after receiving a 'wind shear alert'; ATC responding with follow up questions regarding company policy and aircraft equipment.
Narrative: While on a visual approach for Runway 27; we received a wind shear warning at approximately 500 FT. We initiated a go-around and told the Tower we were going around for a wind shear warning. The Tower gave us a heading of 290 and told us to contact Departure. We came back around for a normal landing on Runway 27. When we landed; we were asked to call the Tower Supervisor. The Tower Supervisor informed me that we had done nothing wrong; however; we were the second Company aircraft to go around for wind shear with no weather in the area. I told him it is Company policy to go around for a wind shear warning. He stated he was aware of that policy but asked me to pass on to the Company that its causes a problem for the Tower when they are landing 27 and taking off on 22. He asked me if the Company could take a look at the equipment in the airplane or our policy on go-arounds. I told him I would. The ATC Coordinator told me that he was aware of the problem.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.