During training flight, student flew approach and missed approach improperly.

Attributes
ACN	91897
Time
Date	198808
Day	Thu
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : apa
State Reference	CO
Altitude	msl bound lower : 8000 msl bound upper : 8000
Environment
Flight Conditions	IMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : den tower : apa
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 2 Eng, Retractable Gear
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	instruction : instructor
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 835 flight time type : 40
ASRS Report	91897
Person 2
Affiliation	Other
Function	instruction : trainee
Qualification	pilot : student
Events
Anomaly	altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

On ILS 35R to low approach, G/south indications was erratic (ATIS report indicated ILS localizer was being worked on but received it correctly). No flag displayed on HSI for either localizer-G/south malfunction. Student attempted to follow G/south and arrived over airport at 8000' MSL. No report received by tower at OM inbound. Reported to tower over airport and they advised of missed approach procedure. Should be as published. Changed to approach for another ILS 35R at apa which was flown correctly. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: ATC did clear them for the ILS approach even though the ATIS said the ILS was being worked on. They did not get any indication of the LOM on the first approach but did on the second. He couldn't remember if they got the LMM. He says that the ILS has been shut down for the past few days for work, so there apparently was something wrong with it on the day of his report.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: DURING TRAINING FLT, STUDENT FLEW APCH AND MISSED APCH IMPROPERLY.

Narrative: ON ILS 35R TO LOW APCH, G/S INDICATIONS WAS ERRATIC (ATIS RPT INDICATED ILS LOC WAS BEING WORKED ON BUT RECEIVED IT CORRECTLY). NO FLAG DISPLAYED ON HSI FOR EITHER LOC-G/S MALFUNCTION. STUDENT ATTEMPTED TO FOLLOW G/S AND ARRIVED OVER ARPT AT 8000' MSL. NO RPT RECEIVED BY TWR AT OM INBND. RPTED TO TWR OVER ARPT AND THEY ADVISED OF MISSED APCH PROC. SHOULD BE AS PUBLISHED. CHANGED TO APCH FOR ANOTHER ILS 35R AT APA WHICH WAS FLOWN CORRECTLY. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: ATC DID CLR THEM FOR THE ILS APCH EVEN THOUGH THE ATIS SAID THE ILS WAS BEING WORKED ON. THEY DID NOT GET ANY INDICATION OF THE LOM ON THE FIRST APCH BUT DID ON THE SECOND. HE COULDN'T REMEMBER IF THEY GOT THE LMM. HE SAYS THAT THE ILS HAS BEEN SHUT DOWN FOR THE PAST FEW DAYS FOR WORK, SO THERE APPARENTLY WAS SOMETHING WRONG WITH IT ON THE DAY OF HIS RPT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.