Narrative:

First officer flying and communicating (captain not in loop) was clrd to cross 60 south of sdz at FL240. First officer read back 'sixteen south at 240'. Should have read 'one six south at 240'. Controller should have clrd us to cross 'six zero south at 240'. I questioned first officer on the 16 figure (an odd distance that didn't correspond to an intersection on arrival chart). At about 65 mi south of sdz we finally straightened out the distance albeit too late to make the crossing. When I asked controller to waive the crossing he said 'just do the best you can', which is meaningless. Standard radio phraseology should always be used. There are sound reasons for its use and I'm sure it has evolved out of screw-ups like the aforementioned.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CLRNC TO CROSS 60 DME SOUTH AT 240.

Narrative: F/O FLYING AND COMMUNICATING (CAPT NOT IN LOOP) WAS CLRD TO CROSS 60 S OF SDZ AT FL240. F/O READ BACK 'SIXTEEN S AT 240'. SHOULD HAVE READ 'ONE SIX SOUTH AT 240'. CTLR SHOULD HAVE CLRD US TO CROSS 'SIX ZERO SOUTH AT 240'. I QUESTIONED F/O ON THE 16 FIGURE (AN ODD DISTANCE THAT DIDN'T CORRESPOND TO AN INTXN ON ARRIVAL CHART). AT ABOUT 65 MI SOUTH OF SDZ WE FINALLY STRAIGHTENED OUT THE DISTANCE ALBEIT TOO LATE TO MAKE THE XING. WHEN I ASKED CTLR TO WAIVE THE XING HE SAID 'JUST DO THE BEST YOU CAN', WHICH IS MEANINGLESS. STANDARD RADIO PHRASEOLOGY SHOULD ALWAYS BE USED. THERE ARE SOUND REASONS FOR ITS USE AND I'M SURE IT HAS EVOLVED OUT OF SCREW-UPS LIKE THE AFOREMENTIONED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.