![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 895668 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 201006 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | TEB.Airport | 
| State Reference | NJ | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Citation Excel (C560XL) | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb | 
| Route In Use | SID RUUDY 2 | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying | 
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) | 
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 75 Flight Crew Total 8700 Flight Crew Type 500  | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Overshoot Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy  | 
Narrative:
[We] departed teb RUUDY2. Upon reaching 1500 ft; I advised pilot flying that I was setting next altitude - 2000 MSL. Pilot flying asked if he could climb to 2000 ft. I read departure instructions to him to ensure no miscommunication; 'cross wentz at 1500 MSL; then via 280 degrees track to tasca; cross tasca at 2000 MSL or as assigned.' we were not assigned an alternate altitude. I continued with my after takeoff checks; talking to ATC and following commands of pilot flying. Passing through 1700 ft; ATC advised we were supposed to be at 1500 MSL. I looked at map display and saw we were 1.8 from tasca or .2 past wentz. I believe the pilot flying may have misinterpreted what I read and possibly initiated climb slightly early. I asked ATC if they wanted us to descend back down to 1500 MSL; they said no and gave us 5000 MSL. The rest of the flight continued normally.we had briefed this departure twice on the ground; once during the start-up checklist and one more time holding short of departure runway. We both had been into teb before and knew this was busy airspace. In the future I will monitor flight path and altitudes a little closer and hold off on some of the after takeoff duties until such time that I feel we are compliant with departure procedure.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CE-560 flight crew failed to cross WENTZ at 1500 MSL as directed on the RUUDY 2 RNAV SID from TEB.
Narrative: [We] departed TEB RUUDY2. Upon reaching 1500 FT; I advised pilot flying that I was setting next altitude - 2000 MSL. Pilot flying asked if he could climb to 2000 FT. I read departure instructions to him to ensure no miscommunication; 'cross WENTZ at 1500 MSL; then via 280 degrees track to TASCA; cross TASCA at 2000 MSL or as assigned.' We were not assigned an alternate altitude. I continued with my after takeoff checks; talking to ATC and following commands of pilot flying. Passing through 1700 FT; ATC advised we were supposed to be at 1500 MSL. I looked at map display and saw we were 1.8 from TASCA or .2 past WENTZ. I believe the pilot flying may have misinterpreted what I read and possibly initiated climb slightly early. I asked ATC if they wanted us to descend back down to 1500 MSL; they said no and gave us 5000 MSL. The rest of the flight continued normally.We had briefed this departure twice on the ground; once during the start-up checklist and one more time holding short of departure runway. We both had been into TEB before and knew this was busy airspace. In the future I will monitor flight path and altitudes a little closer and hold off on some of the after takeoff duties until such time that I feel we are compliant with departure procedure.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.