Narrative:

Air carrier Y was issued a missed approach runway 4R. North local trainee issued go around instructions to air carrier Z at the departure end of runway 9R to get in trial of him on a 140 heading. Air carrier Y was issued a 090 heading from south local controller to get in trail then issued 120 heading. Air carrier Y read back 090 and left the frequency. South local was alerted air carrier Y did not take the 120 heading and subsequently came side to side with air carrier X which resulted in a loss of separation. There were a few factors that did not help the incident. 1. The center console prevented both local controllers from providing instant visual separation. 2. I physically walked approximately 20 ft to point the departure out (air carrier Z) to the south local controller; as I was pointing out the runway 9R departure; my trainee departed air carrier X off runway 4L to a 090 heading. I strongly believe that if I didn't coordinate the exact location of the 9R departure a loss of separation or something more severe could have happened with that aircraft. 3. The setup of equipment by my trainee hindered my ability to ensure what heading air carrier X was on. 4. New procedure in place that puts pressure on local controllers to climb missed approaches up to 5;000 ft. This might not have been directly related but definitely is an issue at ord with missed approaches.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ORD Controller providing OJT described a loss of separation event during multiple runway operations involving a departure and a missed approach; resulting in two aircraft being side by side with less than required separation.

Narrative: Air Carrier Y was issued a missed approach Runway 4R. North Local Trainee issued go around instructions to Air Carrier Z at the departure end of Runway 9R to get in trial of him on a 140 heading. Air Carrier Y was issued a 090 heading from South Local Controller to get in trail then issued 120 heading. Air Carrier Y read back 090 and left the frequency. South Local was alerted Air Carrier Y did not take the 120 heading and subsequently came side to side with Air Carrier X which resulted in a loss of separation. There were a few factors that did not help the incident. 1. The center console prevented both Local Controllers from providing instant visual separation. 2. I physically walked approximately 20 FT to point the departure out (Air Carrier Z) to the South Local Controller; as I was pointing out the Runway 9R departure; my Trainee departed Air Carrier X off Runway 4L to a 090 heading. I strongly believe that if I didn't coordinate the exact location of the 9R departure a loss of separation or something more severe could have happened with that aircraft. 3. The setup of equipment by my Trainee hindered my ability to ensure what heading Air Carrier X was on. 4. New procedure in place that puts pressure on Local Controllers to climb missed approaches up to 5;000 FT. This might not have been directly related but definitely is an issue at ORD with missed approaches.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.