![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 828260 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200903 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | SOCLO |
| State Reference | WA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Mixed |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Citation Excel (C560XL) |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Route In Use | Vectors Other Instrument Non Precision |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 200 Flight Crew Total 8000 Flight Crew Type 1500 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 120 Flight Crew Total 6000 Flight Crew Type 3000 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
In march 2009 we were enroute to bvs for an approach RNAV runway 10. ATC cleared us direct to soclo intersection; the IAF. We were on a north heading. A clearance was later given to cross solco intersection at 4;000 ft and cleared for the RNAV 10 approach. Since the fact that we were at 4;000 ft and the initial altitude for the approach was 3;900 ft and that we were not on a transition; we assumed we heard the approach clearance to be cleared for straight-in. At solco we turned inbound and resumed the approach without entering the procedure turn. Whidbey approach informed us that we were not cleared for a straight-in and that we should have conducted a full approach. The problem could have been avoided and I think that complacency was a main factor. We do numerous approaches yearly and when we are flying at the initial altitude and being vectored or cleared to a fix; ATC always clears us for a straight-in approach. Lesson learned is that always ask when in doubt.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Citation crew completed a BVS Runway 10 RNAV straight in approach deleting the procedure turn. ATC stated that a procedure turn should have been completed.
Narrative: In March 2009 we were enroute to BVS for an approach RNAV Runway 10. ATC cleared us direct to SOCLO Intersection; the IAF. We were on a north heading. A clearance was later given to cross SOLCO Intersection at 4;000 FT and cleared for the RNAV 10 approach. Since the fact that we were at 4;000 FT and the initial altitude for the approach was 3;900 FT and that we were not on a transition; we assumed we heard the approach clearance to be cleared for straight-in. At SOLCO we turned inbound and resumed the approach without entering the procedure turn. Whidbey Approach informed us that we were not cleared for a straight-in and that we should have conducted a full approach. The problem could have been avoided and I think that complacency was a main factor. We do numerous approaches yearly and when we are flying at the initial altitude and being vectored or cleared to a fix; ATC always clears us for a straight-in approach. Lesson learned is that always ask when in doubt.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.