![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 822915 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200902 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | PHL.Airport |
| State Reference | PA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Beechcraft Twin Turboprop or Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Landing |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Local |
| Experience | Air Traffic Control Radar 8 Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 2 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Narrative:
King air was inbound for runway 17 on a recorded run. A B737-300 was inbound to runway 27R. I advised the front line manager (supervisor) when both aircraft were 6 miles out that there was a potential conflict at the airport. He told me that there was no problem with the B737 passing through the intersection while the king air was on the recorded run. I was aware that passing through the intersection did not disturb the recorded run; but I felt that there might still be a tie at the intersection. He ordered me to assign the B737 runway 27L; which does not intersect with runway 17. I tried to raise objection to this action; because I was still concerned that there might be a potential conflict because the king air was low approach only; and his departure course could still put him in the vicinity of the B737. He became very frustrated with me questioning his authority; and again ordered me to assign the B737 runway 27L. I pointed the B737 out to the king air when it was on about a 3 mile final. At that time he advised the traffic in sight and said he would maintain visual separation from it. I also had both aircraft in sight. The king air did pass above and behind the B737. I was very uncomfortable with the front line manager ordering me to run such a tight and potentially dangerous operation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PHL Local Controller voiced concern regarding a Supervisor directed event involving a King Air making a low approach to Runway 17 and an arrival to Runway 27L; alleging situation was potentially unsafe.
Narrative: King Air was inbound for Runway 17 on a recorded run. A B737-300 was inbound to Runway 27R. I advised the Front Line Manager (Supervisor) when both aircraft were 6 miles out that there was a potential conflict at the airport. He told me that there was no problem with the B737 passing through the intersection while the King Air was on the recorded run. I was aware that passing through the intersection did not disturb the recorded run; but I felt that there might still be a tie at the intersection. He ordered me to assign the B737 Runway 27L; which does not intersect with Runway 17. I tried to raise objection to this action; because I was still concerned that there might be a potential conflict because the King Air was low approach only; and his departure course could still put him in the vicinity of the B737. He became very frustrated with me questioning his authority; and again ordered me to assign the B737 Runway 27L. I pointed the B737 out to the King Air when it was on about a 3 mile final. At that time he advised the traffic in sight and said he would maintain visual separation from it. I also had both aircraft in sight. The King Air did pass above and behind the B737. I was very uncomfortable with the Front Line Manager ordering me to run such a tight and potentially dangerous operation.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.