Narrative:

Prior to departure from ZZZ I was notified by another pilot of a NOTAM for the ZZZ abc departure. It is 2.9 DME from ZZZ VOR turn left 040. The NOTAM on the flight plan had us using 7.8 from ZZZ1. The other pilot questioned ATC about this and was told not to use ZZZ1 VOR. When we called for clearance we asked and were told to use ZZZ VOR. I sent a message to dispatch asking what was up. They (dispatch) advised that last week the ZZZ VOR was inoperative and ZZZ1 VOR was being used. It should have been changed a week ago.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ACR PILOT WAS NOTIFIED BY ANOTHER PILOT OF A SID NAVAID CHANGE. AFTER VERIFYING WITH ATC THAT THE CHANGE OCCURRED A WEEK PRIOR; REPORTER CALLED DISPATCH TO SEE WHY THE NOTAMS DID NOT REFLECT THE CHANGE.

Narrative: PRIOR TO DEPARTURE FROM ZZZ I WAS NOTIFIED BY ANOTHER PILOT OF A NOTAM FOR THE ZZZ ABC DEP. IT IS 2.9 DME FROM ZZZ VOR TURN LEFT 040. THE NOTAM ON THE FLT PLAN HAD US USING 7.8 FROM ZZZ1. THE OTHER PILOT QUESTIONED ATC ABOUT THIS AND WAS TOLD NOT TO USE ZZZ1 VOR. WHEN WE CALLED FOR CLRNC WE ASKED AND WERE TOLD TO USE ZZZ VOR. I SENT A MESSAGE TO DISPATCH ASKING WHAT WAS UP. THEY (DISPATCH) ADVISED THAT LAST WEEK THE ZZZ VOR WAS INOP AND ZZZ1 VOR WAS BEING USED. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CHANGED A WEEK AGO.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.