 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Isp controller described wrong runway departure; alleging that tiph restrictions were a causal factor in this pilot deviation.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 753124 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200709 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : isp.airport |
| State Reference | NY |
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll ground : maintenance |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : local |
| Experience | controller limited radar : 20 controller time certified in position1 : 15 controller time certified in position2 : 3 |
| ASRS Report | 753124 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance FAA |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Aircraft on IFR flight plan; pilot unfamiliar with field. Pilot was instructed to taxi to runway 33L via taxiway C and runway 10. Pilot crossed runway 33L and was instructed to hold short on the other side (runway 28). Pilot was cleared for takeoff on runway 33L; but departed runway 28. I expected him to do so; and got permission from ground control to use runway 28. I could not instruct the aircraft to taxi into position and hold as I would have liked; as we did not have sufficient staffing to use tiph. No other aircraft were involved; and no paperwork was filed. Preventing the pilot from crossing the runway while taxiing would have been difficult; but if I were allowed to use tiph; the aircraft would have departed the correct runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ISP CTLR DESCRIBED WRONG RWY DEP; ALLEGING THAT TIPH RESTRICTIONS WERE A CAUSAL FACTOR IN THIS PLTDEV.
Narrative: ACFT ON IFR FLT PLAN; PLT UNFAMILIAR WITH FIELD. PLT WAS INSTRUCTED TO TAXI TO RWY 33L VIA TXWY C AND RWY 10. PLT CROSSED RWY 33L AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO HOLD SHORT ON THE OTHER SIDE (RWY 28). PLT WAS CLRED FOR TKOF ON RWY 33L; BUT DEPARTED RWY 28. I EXPECTED HIM TO DO SO; AND GOT PERMISSION FROM GND CTL TO USE RWY 28. I COULD NOT INSTRUCT THE ACFT TO TAXI INTO POS AND HOLD AS I WOULD HAVE LIKED; AS WE DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT STAFFING TO USE TIPH. NO OTHER ACFT WERE INVOLVED; AND NO PAPERWORK WAS FILED. PREVENTING THE PLT FROM XING THE RWY WHILE TAXIING WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT; BUT IF I WERE ALLOWED TO USE TIPH; THE ACFT WOULD HAVE DEPARTED THE CORRECT RWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.