Narrative:

I complied with all ATC instructions. I descended to 10000 ft. We were advised of traffic at 9000 ft and 9500 ft but were not aware of their direction of flight. Our TCAS display showed closure when the other aircraft symbol turned solid blue. The approach controller advised the mooney that traffic was a crj (us) passing overhead 500 ft; our TCAS was turning yellow 'traffic traffic.' there was too much chatter to get a turn or change in altitude. When other aircraft turned red and we got RA I had already disconnected autoplt and added thrust to begin deviation. At RA I climbed immediately. Why do controllers think 500 ft of 'clearance' is enough?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CRJ PILOT ON DESCENT INTO JAX HAD AN NMAC WITH A MOONEY.

Narrative: I COMPLIED WITH ALL ATC INSTRUCTIONS. I DSNDED TO 10000 FT. WE WERE ADVISED OF TFC AT 9000 FT AND 9500 FT BUT WERE NOT AWARE OF THEIR DIRECTION OF FLT. OUR TCAS DISPLAY SHOWED CLOSURE WHEN THE OTHER ACFT SYMBOL TURNED SOLID BLUE. THE APCH CTLR ADVISED THE MOONEY THAT TFC WAS A CRJ (US) PASSING OVERHEAD 500 FT; OUR TCAS WAS TURNING YELLOW 'TFC TFC.' THERE WAS TOO MUCH CHATTER TO GET A TURN OR CHANGE IN ALT. WHEN OTHER ACFT TURNED RED AND WE GOT RA I HAD ALREADY DISCONNECTED AUTOPLT AND ADDED THRUST TO BEGIN DEV. AT RA I CLBED IMMEDIATELY. WHY DO CTLRS THINK 500 FT OF 'CLRNC' IS ENOUGH?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.