![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 732069 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200703 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : amg.airport | 
| State Reference | GA | 
| Altitude | msl single value : 36000 | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx.artcc | 
| Operator | general aviation : personal | 
| Make Model Name | PC-12 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | cruise : level | 
| Route In Use | enroute : on vectors | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx.artcc | 
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier | 
| Make Model Name | MD-88 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | cruise : level | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa | 
| Function | controller : radar | 
| Qualification | controller : radar controller : military  | 
| Experience | controller military : 10 controller radar : 3  | 
| ASRS Report | 732069 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other | 
| Function | flight crew : captain | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : clearance non adherence : required legal separation  | 
| Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other controllera  | 
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action  | 
| Consequence | faa : investigated | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | FAA | 
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
I was working R49 sector at ZJX center; I noticed that I was given a 100 KT overtake from ZTL with an air carrier and aircraft X (PC12). I then ask the air carrier would they be able to accept FL380 for traffic. They said unable; that they were too heavy. I then asked aircraft X if they can accept FL380 for traffic. The aircraft stated yes and advised it would be a slow climb about 500 FPM. I said that is fine. I then turned aircraft X 20 degrees left; vectors for your climb. I did not issue a climb clearance because I had another air carrier northbound at FL370. Shortly thereafter; aircraft X started its climb. When I noticed the altitude change; I immediately asked aircraft X; 'verify level at FL360.' advised to aircraft X that I didn't issue a climb clearance and to maintain FL360. I then immediately told the aircraft Y to turn 30 degrees right for traffic. The pilot stated that the other aircraft was approaching rapidly. I then turned aircraft X 30 degrees right and maintain FL360 report level. I was trying to re-establish separation. The aircraft Y said that his TCAS went off so he took evasive action to maneuver. After further review from quality assurance; it wasn't my fault they called it a pilot deviation; because I never issued a climb clearance -- just a turn to vector for aircraft X climb. They are now pursuing the pilot. Also looking at the replay; aircraft Y never took the 20 degree left turn; he just decided to climb instead.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZJX CTLR DESCRIBED LOSS OF SEPARATION AT FL360 WHEN PC12 WAS VECTORED FOR SEPARATION; BUT INITIATED A CLIMB BEFORE CLRNC WAS ISSUED.
Narrative: I WAS WORKING R49 SECTOR AT ZJX CTR; I NOTICED THAT I WAS GIVEN A 100 KT OVERTAKE FROM ZTL WITH AN ACR AND ACFT X (PC12). I THEN ASK THE ACR WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO ACCEPT FL380 FOR TFC. THEY SAID UNABLE; THAT THEY WERE TOO HVY. I THEN ASKED ACFT X IF THEY CAN ACCEPT FL380 FOR TFC. THE ACFT STATED YES AND ADVISED IT WOULD BE A SLOW CLB ABOUT 500 FPM. I SAID THAT IS FINE. I THEN TURNED ACFT X 20 DEGS L; VECTORS FOR YOUR CLB. I DID NOT ISSUE A CLB CLRNC BECAUSE I HAD ANOTHER ACR NBOUND AT FL370. SHORTLY THEREAFTER; ACFT X STARTED ITS CLB. WHEN I NOTICED THE ALT CHANGE; I IMMEDIATELY ASKED ACFT X; 'VERIFY LEVEL AT FL360.' ADVISED TO ACFT X THAT I DIDN'T ISSUE A CLB CLRNC AND TO MAINTAIN FL360. I THEN IMMEDIATELY TOLD THE ACFT Y TO TURN 30 DEGS R FOR TFC. THE PLT STATED THAT THE OTHER ACFT WAS APCHING RAPIDLY. I THEN TURNED ACFT X 30 DEGS R AND MAINTAIN FL360 RPT LEVEL. I WAS TRYING TO RE-ESTABLISH SEPARATION. THE ACFT Y SAID THAT HIS TCAS WENT OFF SO HE TOOK EVASIVE ACTION TO MANEUVER. AFTER FURTHER REVIEW FROM QUALITY ASSURANCE; IT WASN'T MY FAULT THEY CALLED IT A PLTDEV; BECAUSE I NEVER ISSUED A CLB CLRNC -- JUST A TURN TO VECTOR FOR ACFT X CLB. THEY ARE NOW PURSUING THE PLT. ALSO LOOKING AT THE REPLAY; ACFT Y NEVER TOOK THE 20 DEG L TURN; HE JUST DECIDED TO CLB INSTEAD.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.