CRJ700 flight crew has spoiler fail message on final and lands.

Attributes
ACN	715256
Time
Date	200610
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : cvg.airport
State Reference	KY
Altitude	msl single value : 4000
Environment
Flight Conditions	IMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : cvg.tracon
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Regional Jet 700 ER&LR
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Route In Use	approach : charted visual
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 5200 flight time type : 1550
ASRS Report	715256
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 160 flight time total : 2500 flight time type : 800
ASRS Report	716072
Events
Anomaly	aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : published procedure
Independent Detector	aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : eicas warning other flight crewa other flight crewb
Resolutory Action	flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : landed as precaution
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft
Primary Problem	Aircraft

Narrative:

On the approach into cvg; we deployed the flight spoilers and received the outboard spoileron and outboard flight spoilers caution messages. I had this identical problem on another aircraft last month and was familiar with the QRH procedure. The first officer performed the QRH procedure which included adding 20% to our landing distance. However; this was the procedure for the outboard flight spoiler caution. The procedure for spoileron states to add 20% and pick a runway with the least crosswind. This procedure is printed on the page on the other side of the temporary revision. We added 20% but did not land on the runway with least crosswind (runway 27). The landing was uneventful. We made this error because we had limited time prior to landing and I did not request a vector off of the approach. I felt that since we were on the approach; it was safe to continue since I had experienced this problem a month before. I thought the temporary revision may have removed the requirement to land into the wind. In the future; I plan to request a delay vector if presented with these circumstances. This way we will have more time to ensure all procedures are followed (and we can back each other up with the added time).

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CRJ700 FLT CREW HAS SPOILER FAIL MESSAGE ON FINAL AND LANDS.

Narrative: ON THE APCH INTO CVG; WE DEPLOYED THE FLT SPOILERS AND RECEIVED THE OUTBOARD SPOILERON AND OUTBOARD FLT SPOILERS CAUTION MESSAGES. I HAD THIS IDENTICAL PROB ON ANOTHER ACFT LAST MONTH AND WAS FAMILIAR WITH THE QRH PROC. THE FO PERFORMED THE QRH PROC WHICH INCLUDED ADDING 20% TO OUR LNDG DISTANCE. HOWEVER; THIS WAS THE PROC FOR THE OUTBOARD FLT SPOILER CAUTION. THE PROC FOR SPOILERON STATES TO ADD 20% AND PICK A RWY WITH THE LEAST XWIND. THIS PROC IS PRINTED ON THE PAGE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TEMPORARY REVISION. WE ADDED 20% BUT DID NOT LAND ON THE RWY WITH LEAST XWIND (RWY 27). THE LNDG WAS UNEVENTFUL. WE MADE THIS ERROR BECAUSE WE HAD LIMITED TIME PRIOR TO LNDG AND I DID NOT REQUEST A VECTOR OFF OF THE APCH. I FELT THAT SINCE WE WERE ON THE APCH; IT WAS SAFE TO CONTINUE SINCE I HAD EXPERIENCED THIS PROB A MONTH BEFORE. I THOUGHT THE TEMPORARY REVISION MAY HAVE REMOVED THE REQUIREMENT TO LAND INTO THE WIND. IN THE FUTURE; I PLAN TO REQUEST A DELAY VECTOR IF PRESENTED WITH THESE CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS WAY WE WILL HAVE MORE TIME TO ENSURE ALL PROCS ARE FOLLOWED (AND WE CAN BACK EACH OTHER UP WITH THE ADDED TIME).

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.