![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 703273 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200605 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | maintenance : technician |
| ASRS Report | 703273 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | maintenance : lead technician |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
| Independent Detector | other other : 3 |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | other other |
| Factors | |
| Maintenance | contributing factor : work cards contributing factor : manuals performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : logbook entry |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft Chart Or Publication Maintenance Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
I was assigned to work aircraft by my lead who told me to pull up the inspection for a bird strike from the maintenance computer. Having completed the procedure; I signed off the maintenance pilot report per the maintenance manual. No special cards were issued; and there wasn't a maintenance manual directive to only use the check card from the gpm. My lead later reviewed the work package; and my supervisor released it (the aircraft) back to service without any mention of paperwork errors. I was given the gpm reference and counseled by my supervisor. When there is an inbound maintenance pilot report for bird strike; the bird strike check card should be issued with the rest of the work cards in the work package; and the card requirement should have been brought up in a crew meeting at start of shift.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B757-200 HAD A BIRD STRIKE INSPECTION PERFORMED PER THE GPM. PAPERWORK DID NOT CONTAIN A NON ROUTINE CARD DIRECTING INSPECTION.
Narrative: I WAS ASSIGNED TO WORK ACFT BY MY LEAD WHO TOLD ME TO PULL UP THE INSPECTION FOR A BIRD STRIKE FROM THE MAINT COMPUTER. HAVING COMPLETED THE PROC; I SIGNED OFF THE MAINT PLT RPT PER THE MAINT MANUAL. NO SPECIAL CARDS WERE ISSUED; AND THERE WASN'T A MAINT MANUAL DIRECTIVE TO ONLY USE THE CHK CARD FROM THE GPM. MY LEAD LATER REVIEWED THE WORK PACKAGE; AND MY SUPVR RELEASED IT (THE ACFT) BACK TO SVC WITHOUT ANY MENTION OF PAPERWORK ERRORS. I WAS GIVEN THE GPM REF AND COUNSELED BY MY SUPVR. WHEN THERE IS AN INBOUND MAINT PLT RPT FOR BIRD STRIKE; THE BIRD STRIKE CHK CARD SHOULD BE ISSUED WITH THE REST OF THE WORK CARDS IN THE WORK PACKAGE; AND THE CARD REQUIREMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP IN A CREW MEETING AT START OF SHIFT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.