![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 698700 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200605 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : bvs.airport | 
| State Reference | WA | 
| Altitude | msl single value : 500 | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower | 
| Operator | general aviation : personal | 
| Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee/Archer II/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | descent : approach | 
| Route In Use | approach : visual | 
| Flight Plan | None | 
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Helicopter | 
| Flight Phase | other | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other | 
| Function | flight crew : single pilot oversight : pic  | 
| Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 21 flight time total : 3000 flight time type : 2700  | 
| ASRS Report | 698700 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Function | oversight : pic | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : far non adherence : required legal separation other spatial deviation  | 
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa | 
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action | 
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 200 vertical : 85  | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance  | 
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
Narrative:
I announced I was on left base to land on runway 04. There were 2 other aircraft in the pattern for the other runway on 28. When I was on a quarter mile final; I noticed the helicopter hovering over the runway. I announced my intentions to land several times and asked if the helicopter heard me. I received no response. Afterward he said he hadn't heard me; either. Our transmissions may have been blocked by other aircraft in the pattern. I was on descent at this point ready to land and was concerned about doing a sharp bank in either direction because of other traffic in pattern and the possibility of a stall. I felt at this time the safest evasive action to take was to make a sharp descent under the hovering helicopter and land; which I did. The helicopter pilot thinks he was approximately 100 ft AGL at the time. I have never had a situation like this happen in all the years I've flown. What caused the problem was no communications were being received by either pilot. I was concerned about conducting a sharp banking turn and felt I had adequate clearance to get under the helicopter. What I could do to prevent this from happening in the future is to use the runway that other traffic was using at the time. There wouldn't have been a hovering helicopter on an active use runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PIPER CHEROKEE PLT ENCOUNTERS A HELI ON FINAL AND TAKES EVASIVE ACTION AND LANDED AT BVS.
Narrative: I ANNOUNCED I WAS ON LEFT BASE TO LAND ON RWY 04. THERE WERE 2 OTHER ACFT IN THE PATTERN FOR THE OTHER RWY ON 28. WHEN I WAS ON A QUARTER MILE FINAL; I NOTICED THE HELI HOVERING OVER THE RWY. I ANNOUNCED MY INTENTIONS TO LAND SEVERAL TIMES AND ASKED IF THE HELI HEARD ME. I RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. AFTERWARD HE SAID HE HADN'T HEARD ME; EITHER. OUR TRANSMISSIONS MAY HAVE BEEN BLOCKED BY OTHER ACFT IN THE PATTERN. I WAS ON DESCENT AT THIS POINT READY TO LAND AND WAS CONCERNED ABOUT DOING A SHARP BANK IN EITHER DIRECTION BECAUSE OF OTHER TFC IN PATTERN AND THE POSSIBILITY OF A STALL. I FELT AT THIS TIME THE SAFEST EVASIVE ACTION TO TAKE WAS TO MAKE A SHARP DESCENT UNDER THE HOVERING HELI AND LAND; WHICH I DID. THE HELI PLT THINKS HE WAS APPROX 100 FT AGL AT THE TIME. I HAVE NEVER HAD A SITUATION LIKE THIS HAPPEN IN ALL THE YEARS I'VE FLOWN. WHAT CAUSED THE PROB WAS NO COMMUNICATIONS WERE BEING RECEIVED BY EITHER PLT. I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT CONDUCTING A SHARP BANKING TURN AND FELT I HAD ADEQUATE CLRNC TO GET UNDER THE HELI. WHAT I COULD DO TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING IN THE FUTURE IS TO USE THE RWY THAT OTHER TFC WAS USING AT THE TIME. THERE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN A HOVERING HELI ON AN ACTIVE USE RWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.