Narrative:

I was on approach and lost position awareness due to several factors. The conditions were VFR so I could see and avoid obstructions or other aircraft; and none were involved. I did however get low on the approach. Contributing factors were a new GPS was being used to monitor the approach and although I had used it before (just for VFR flight) -- this was the first time I used it on an approach. It gave me the distance to the next fix. I had programmed it to give distance to airport; but in the approach mode it gives distance to next fix; so this confused me. I thought I was closer to the airport than I actually was. I also had a glidescope failure at the same time (in the aircraft) but failed to notice the flag until I had gone low on the approach. The controller thankfully was watching me and advised me I was low at the FAF --- not past the FAF as I thought. I was trying to do too much using a new piece of equipment without doing more practice with it in a practice environment. I assumed a higher workload that I should have without additional cockpit resources available. Next time I get a new piece of equipment I will use it in the VFR practice environment prior to trying it in IFR and not let new equipment increase my workload -- instead I will use it to decrease my workload.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MISINTERPRETING INFO ON AN UNFAMILIAR GPS SYSTEM; A BEECHCRAFT PLT DSNDS EARLY ON PRACTICE IFR APCH.

Narrative: I WAS ON APCH AND LOST POSITION AWARENESS DUE TO SEVERAL FACTORS. THE CONDITIONS WERE VFR SO I COULD SEE AND AVOID OBSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER ACFT; AND NONE WERE INVOLVED. I DID HOWEVER GET LOW ON THE APCH. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE A NEW GPS WAS BEING USED TO MONITOR THE APCH AND ALTHOUGH I HAD USED IT BEFORE (JUST FOR VFR FLT) -- THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME I USED IT ON AN APCH. IT GAVE ME THE DISTANCE TO THE NEXT FIX. I HAD PROGRAMMED IT TO GIVE DISTANCE TO ARPT; BUT IN THE APCH MODE IT GIVES DISTANCE TO NEXT FIX; SO THIS CONFUSED ME. I THOUGHT I WAS CLOSER TO THE ARPT THAN I ACTUALLY WAS. I ALSO HAD A GLIDESCOPE FAILURE AT THE SAME TIME (IN THE ACFT) BUT FAILED TO NOTICE THE FLAG UNTIL I HAD GONE LOW ON THE APCH. THE CTLR THANKFULLY WAS WATCHING ME AND ADVISED ME I WAS LOW AT THE FAF --- NOT PAST THE FAF AS I THOUGHT. I WAS TRYING TO DO TOO MUCH USING A NEW PIECE OF EQUIP WITHOUT DOING MORE PRACTICE WITH IT IN A PRACTICE ENVIRONMENT. I ASSUMED A HIGHER WORKLOAD THAT I SHOULD HAVE WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COCKPIT RESOURCES AVAILABLE. NEXT TIME I GET A NEW PIECE OF EQUIP I WILL USE IT IN THE VFR PRACTICE ENVIRONMENT PRIOR TO TRYING IT IN IFR AND NOT LET NEW EQUIP INCREASE MY WORKLOAD -- INSTEAD I WILL USE IT TO DECREASE MY WORKLOAD.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.