Narrative:

Prior to a day VFR flight; the left landing light had been removed for repair. The power and control wires were insulated from the airframe and secured. The wing opening left by the removed landing light had been covered to keep out airborne debris and perhaps birds from nesting while on the ground. The logic applied was as follows: the landing light is not required for day VFR flight. The landing light is not a structural member of the wing. The landing light may add to the aerodynamics but not required for day flight -- must not be significant. The tape was only meant as a cover to keep out debris. The landing light had been shipped to the mechanic for repair. We didn't think this would affect the performance.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C320 WAS FLOWN WITH THE WING MOUNTED L LNDG LIGHT ASSEMBLY REMOVED AND THE HOLE TAPED OVER.

Narrative: PRIOR TO A DAY VFR FLT; THE L LNDG LIGHT HAD BEEN REMOVED FOR REPAIR. THE PWR AND CTL WIRES WERE INSULATED FROM THE AIRFRAME AND SECURED. THE WING OPENING LEFT BY THE REMOVED LNDG LIGHT HAD BEEN COVERED TO KEEP OUT AIRBORNE DEBRIS AND PERHAPS BIRDS FROM NESTING WHILE ON THE GND. THE LOGIC APPLIED WAS AS FOLLOWS: THE LNDG LIGHT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR DAY VFR FLT. THE LNDG LIGHT IS NOT A STRUCTURAL MEMBER OF THE WING. THE LNDG LIGHT MAY ADD TO THE AERODYNAMICS BUT NOT REQUIRED FOR DAY FLT -- MUST NOT BE SIGNIFICANT. THE TAPE WAS ONLY MEANT AS A COVER TO KEEP OUT DEBRIS. THE LNDG LIGHT HAD BEEN SHIPPED TO THE MECH FOR REPAIR. WE DIDN'T THINK THIS WOULD AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.