![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 655199 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200504 | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : iah.airport | 
| State Reference | TX | 
| Altitude | agl single value : 500 | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : iah.tower | 
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier | 
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65 Undifferentiated or Other Model  | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | descent : approach | 
| Route In Use | approach : visual | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : iah.tower | 
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier | 
| Make Model Name | Brasilia EMB-120 All Series | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff climbout : initial  | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic  | 
| Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : atp  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 14000 flight time type : 2500  | 
| ASRS Report | 655199 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : first officer | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : required legal separation  | 
| Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other flight crewa  | 
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action | 
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 400 | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance | 
| Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error | 
Narrative:
I was the PF. We were on an ILS to runway 9 at iah; visual conditions; and cleared to land. When we were approximately 3 or 4 mi from the runway; houston tower told us to watch for an E120 departing left to right in front of us. My first officer and I both spotted the aircraft as it began its takeoff roll on runway 15R. We both remarked out loud that if it got off the ground quickly; there cold be a problem. Sure enough; the brasilia rose rapidly. At about 500 ft AGL; I was forced to make a mild evasive maneuver; up and to the left; in order to avoid a collision. (I was still able to land on runway 9.) the encounter generated an audible TCASII TA alert. We later estimated that we'd passed about 300-400 ft from the brasilia. We don't know if the other crew ever saw us. As they deplaned; 3 of our passenger had comments and questions about the 'near miss.' this was an uncomfortable experience. If it is currently houston tower's policy to simultaneously land arrs on runway 9 while launching departures off runway 15L or runway 15R; I think the procedure should be reviewed immediately. If conditions had been slightly different (missed radio call; lighter brasilia; darkness; etc) it might have been much more difficult to avoid a collision.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CL65 ON ILS TO RWY 9 AT IAH WAS REQUIRED TO TAKE EVASIVE ACTION TO AVOID DEP FROM RWY 15R.
Narrative: I WAS THE PF. WE WERE ON AN ILS TO RWY 9 AT IAH; VISUAL CONDITIONS; AND CLRED TO LAND. WHEN WE WERE APPROX 3 OR 4 MI FROM THE RWY; HOUSTON TWR TOLD US TO WATCH FOR AN E120 DEPARTING L TO R IN FRONT OF US. MY FO AND I BOTH SPOTTED THE ACFT AS IT BEGAN ITS TKOF ROLL ON RWY 15R. WE BOTH REMARKED OUT LOUD THAT IF IT GOT OFF THE GND QUICKLY; THERE COLD BE A PROB. SURE ENOUGH; THE BRASILIA ROSE RAPIDLY. AT ABOUT 500 FT AGL; I WAS FORCED TO MAKE A MILD EVASIVE MANEUVER; UP AND TO THE L; IN ORDER TO AVOID A COLLISION. (I WAS STILL ABLE TO LAND ON RWY 9.) THE ENCOUNTER GENERATED AN AUDIBLE TCASII TA ALERT. WE LATER ESTIMATED THAT WE'D PASSED ABOUT 300-400 FT FROM THE BRASILIA. WE DON'T KNOW IF THE OTHER CREW EVER SAW US. AS THEY DEPLANED; 3 OF OUR PAX HAD COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 'NEAR MISS.' THIS WAS AN UNCOMFORTABLE EXPERIENCE. IF IT IS CURRENTLY HOUSTON TWR'S POLICY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY LAND ARRS ON RWY 9 WHILE LAUNCHING DEPS OFF RWY 15L OR RWY 15R; I THINK THE PROC SHOULD BE REVIEWED IMMEDIATELY. IF CONDITIONS HAD BEEN SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT (MISSED RADIO CALL; LIGHTER BRASILIA; DARKNESS; ETC) IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE DIFFICULT TO AVOID A COLLISION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.