Narrative:

I reversed the visual separation rule for climbing and descending with 1 aircraft at 17000 ft and 1 aircraft at FL180. Climbed instead of descended. This is an antiquated rule. There is no difference between climbing from 17000 ft to above an aircraft at FL180; and descending from FL180 to below an aircraft at 17000 ft. It is just as safe either way since at least 1 pilot has the other aircraft in sight. If it isn't safe climbing; it isn't safe descending either. Rule makes no sense and we don't use if often enough to remember which way is good and which way is not good. Fix the rule -- safety will not be compromised.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ZOB CTLR'S MISAPPLICATION OF VISUAL SEPARATION RESULTED IN OPERROR DURING CLBING AND DSNDING INCIDENT AT FL180.

Narrative: I REVERSED THE VISUAL SEPARATION RULE FOR CLBING AND DSNDING WITH 1 ACFT AT 17000 FT AND 1 ACFT AT FL180. CLBED INSTEAD OF DSNDED. THIS IS AN ANTIQUATED RULE. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BTWN CLBING FROM 17000 FT TO ABOVE AN ACFT AT FL180; AND DSNDING FROM FL180 TO BELOW AN ACFT AT 17000 FT. IT IS JUST AS SAFE EITHER WAY SINCE AT LEAST 1 PLT HAS THE OTHER ACFT IN SIGHT. IF IT ISN'T SAFE CLBING; IT ISN'T SAFE DSNDING EITHER. RULE MAKES NO SENSE AND WE DON'T USE IF OFTEN ENOUGH TO REMEMBER WHICH WAY IS GOOD AND WHICH WAY IS NOT GOOD. FIX THE RULE -- SAFETY WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.