Narrative:

Prior to pushback; ramp personnel handed the flight crew a bag slip indicating 29 bags were loaded in the aft baggage compartment. The load manifest was completed and the flight pushed back uneventfully. Aircraft rotation was normal; but immediately after the main gear left the runway; I noticed the aircraft was severely out of trim. I retrimmed the aircraft and the flight continued without further incident. After climbing through 10000 ft; a departure message was relayed to lan operations. During the conversation; we were informed the actual bag count was 49; not 29 as indicated on the bag slip. The difference was 610 pounds; explaining why the aircraft was out of trim.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLT CREW OF CRJ200 ENCOUNTERS OUT OF TRIM CONDITION ON TKOF WHEN AFT PIT BAGGAGE COUNT USED FOR TRIM CALCULATIONS IS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN INCORRECT.

Narrative: PRIOR TO PUSHBACK; RAMP PERSONNEL HANDED THE FLT CREW A BAG SLIP INDICATING 29 BAGS WERE LOADED IN THE AFT BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT. THE LOAD MANIFEST WAS COMPLETED AND THE FLT PUSHED BACK UNEVENTFULLY. ACFT ROTATION WAS NORMAL; BUT IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE MAIN GEAR LEFT THE RWY; I NOTICED THE ACFT WAS SEVERELY OUT OF TRIM. I RETRIMMED THE ACFT AND THE FLT CONTINUED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. AFTER CLBING THROUGH 10000 FT; A DEP MESSAGE WAS RELAYED TO LAN OPS. DURING THE CONVERSATION; WE WERE INFORMED THE ACTUAL BAG COUNT WAS 49; NOT 29 AS INDICATED ON THE BAG SLIP. THE DIFFERENCE WAS 610 LBS; EXPLAINING WHY THE ACFT WAS OUT OF TRIM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.