Narrative:

On taxi in from landing on runway 35L, after taxi-in flows were accomplished, the cabin began to pressurize. I noted the flight/ground switch was in ground position and the field elevation set to 5430 ft. However, the outflow valve was fully closed. The cabin pressure was approximately 4 psi differential and climbing at 2000 FPM. I switched the pressurization panel to 'standby' with no change in outflow valve position. I then switched to manual AC and was able to move the outflow valve to full open and the cabin depressurized. After shutdown, I contacted maintenance by radio, explained this problem and asked for a mechanic to meet the aircraft. I also wrote up a description of this problem in ACARS and submitted it. I met with the mechanic sent by maintenance, then left the cockpit to make room for the next crew. I also explained the problem to the outbound first officer. It appears the ACARS write-up was not received by maintenance. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the first officer advised maintenance of the problem and the outbound crew was also briefed. The reporter is unsure of the maintenance action but is certain the control panel was correctly programmed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 ON TAXI IN TO GATE THE FO NOTED CABIN PRESSURE AT 4 PSI. SWITCHED TO STANDBY AND CABIN DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE INCREASED AT 2000 FPM. SWITCHED TO MANUAL TO OPEN OUTFLOW VALVE.

Narrative: ON TAXI IN FROM LNDG ON RWY 35L, AFTER TAXI-IN FLOWS WERE ACCOMPLISHED, THE CABIN BEGAN TO PRESSURIZE. I NOTED THE FLT/GND SWITCH WAS IN GND POS AND THE FIELD ELEVATION SET TO 5430 FT. HOWEVER, THE OUTFLOW VALVE WAS FULLY CLOSED. THE CABIN PRESSURE WAS APPROX 4 PSI DIFFERENTIAL AND CLBING AT 2000 FPM. I SWITCHED THE PRESSURIZATION PANEL TO 'STANDBY' WITH NO CHANGE IN OUTFLOW VALVE POS. I THEN SWITCHED TO MANUAL AC AND WAS ABLE TO MOVE THE OUTFLOW VALVE TO FULL OPEN AND THE CABIN DEPRESSURIZED. AFTER SHUTDOWN, I CONTACTED MAINT BY RADIO, EXPLAINED THIS PROB AND ASKED FOR A MECH TO MEET THE ACFT. I ALSO WROTE UP A DESCRIPTION OF THIS PROB IN ACARS AND SUBMITTED IT. I MET WITH THE MECH SENT BY MAINT, THEN LEFT THE COCKPIT TO MAKE ROOM FOR THE NEXT CREW. I ALSO EXPLAINED THE PROB TO THE OUTBOUND FO. IT APPEARS THE ACARS WRITE-UP WAS NOT RECEIVED BY MAINT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE FO ADVISED MAINT OF THE PROB AND THE OUTBOUND CREW WAS ALSO BRIEFED. THE RPTR IS UNSURE OF THE MAINT ACTION BUT IS CERTAIN THE CTL PANEL WAS CORRECTLY PROGRAMMED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.